6.7 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| codex-5-3-prompting | How to write system prompts and instructions for GPT-5.3-Codex. Use when constructing or tuning prompts targeting Codex 5.3. |
GPT-5.3-Codex Prompting Guide
GPT-5.3-Codex is fast, capable, and eager. It moves quickly and will skip reading, over-refactor, and drift scope if prompts aren't tight. Explicit constraints matter more than with GPT-5.2-Codex. Include the following blocks as needed when constructing system prompts.
Output shape
Always include. Controls verbosity and response structure.
<output_verbosity_spec>
- Default: 3-6 sentences or <=5 bullets for typical answers.
- Simple yes/no questions: <=2 sentences.
- Complex multi-step or multi-file tasks:
- 1 short overview paragraph
- then <=5 bullets tagged: What changed, Where, Risks, Next steps, Open questions.
- Avoid long narrative paragraphs; prefer compact bullets and short sections.
- Do not rephrase the user's request unless it changes semantics.
</output_verbosity_spec>
Scope constraints
Always include. GPT-5.3-Codex will add features, refactor adjacent code, and invent UI elements if you don't fence it in.
<design_and_scope_constraints>
- Explore any existing design systems and understand them deeply.
- Implement EXACTLY and ONLY what the user requests.
- No extra features, no added components, no UX embellishments.
- Style aligned to the design system at hand.
- Do NOT invent colors, shadows, tokens, animations, or new UI elements unless requested or necessary.
- If any instruction is ambiguous, choose the simplest valid interpretation.
</design_and_scope_constraints>
Context loading
Always include. GPT-5.3-Codex skips reading and starts writing if you don't force it.
<context_loading>
- Read ALL files that will be modified -- in full, not just the sections mentioned in the task.
- Also read key files they import from or that depend on them.
- Absorb surrounding patterns, naming conventions, error handling style, and architecture before writing any code.
- Do not ask clarifying questions about things that are answerable by reading the codebase.
</context_loading>
Plan-first mode
Include for multi-file work, large refactors, or any task with ordering dependencies.
<plan_first>
- Before writing any code, produce a brief implementation plan:
- Files to create vs. modify
- Implementation order and prerequisites
- Key design decisions and edge cases
- Acceptance criteria for "done"
- Get the plan right first. Then implement step by step following the plan.
- If the plan is provided externally, follow it faithfully -- the job is execution, not second-guessing the design.
</plan_first>
Long-context handling
Include when inputs exceed ~10k tokens (multi-chapter docs, long threads, multiple PDFs).
<long_context_handling>
- For inputs longer than ~10k tokens:
- First, produce a short internal outline of the key sections relevant to the task.
- Re-state the constraints explicitly before answering.
- Anchor claims to sections ("In the 'Data Retention' section...") rather than speaking generically.
- If the answer depends on fine details (dates, thresholds, clauses), quote or paraphrase them.
</long_context_handling>
Uncertainty and ambiguity
Include when the task involves underspecified requirements or hallucination-prone domains.
<uncertainty_and_ambiguity>
- If the question is ambiguous or underspecified:
- Ask up to 1-3 precise clarifying questions, OR
- Present 2-3 plausible interpretations with clearly labeled assumptions.
- Never fabricate exact figures, line numbers, or external references when uncertain.
- When unsure, prefer "Based on the provided context..." over absolute claims.
</uncertainty_and_ambiguity>
User updates
Include for agentic / long-running tasks.
<user_updates_spec>
- Send brief updates (1-2 sentences) only when:
- You start a new major phase of work, or
- You discover something that changes the plan.
- Avoid narrating routine tool calls ("reading file...", "running tests...").
- Each update must include at least one concrete outcome ("Found X", "Confirmed Y", "Updated Z").
- Do not expand the task beyond what was asked; if you notice new work, call it out as optional.
</user_updates_spec>
Tool usage
Include when the prompt involves tool-calling agents.
<tool_usage_rules>
- Prefer tools over internal knowledge whenever:
- You need fresh or user-specific data (tickets, orders, configs, logs).
- You reference specific IDs, URLs, or document titles.
- Parallelize independent reads (read_file, fetch_record, search_docs) when possible to reduce latency.
- After any write/update tool call, briefly restate:
- What changed
- Where (ID or path)
- Any follow-up validation performed
</tool_usage_rules>
Reasoning effort
Set model_reasoning_effort via Codex CLI: -c model_reasoning_effort="high"
| Task type | Effort |
|---|---|
| Simple code generation, formatting | low or medium |
| Standard implementation from clear specs | high |
| Complex refactors, plan review, architecture | xhigh |
| Code review (thorough) | high or xhigh |
Backwards compatibility hedging
GPT-5.3-Codex has a strong tendency to preserve old patterns, add compatibility shims, and provide fallback code "just in case" -- even when explicitly told not to worry about backwards compatibility. Vague instructions like "don't worry about backwards compatibility" get interpreted weakly; the model may still hedge.
Use "cutover" to signal a clean, irreversible break. It's a precise industry term that conveys finality and intentional deprecation -- no dual-support phase, no gradual migration, no preserving old behavior.
Instead of:
"Rewrite this and don't worry about backwards compatibility"
Say:
"This is a cutover. No backwards compatibility. Rewrite using only Python 3.12+ features and current best practices. Do not preserve legacy code, polyfills, or deprecated patterns."
Quick reference
- Force reading first. "Read all necessary files before you ask any dumb question."
- Use plan mode. Draft the full task with acceptance criteria before implementing.
- Steer aggressively mid-task. GPT-5.3-Codex handles redirects without losing context. Be direct: "Stop. Fix the actual cause." / "Simplest valid implementation only."
- Constrain scope hard. GPT-5.3-Codex will refactor aggressively if you don't fence it in.
- Watch context burn. Faster model = faster context consumption. Start fresh at ~40%.
- Use domain jargon. "Cutover," "golden-path," "no fallbacks," "domain split" get cleaner, faster responses.
- Download libraries locally. Tell it to read them for better context than relying on training data.