Correct the Pi advice: per-agent skills are the design; per-agent extensions via adapterConfig.command

This commit is contained in:
Sam
2026-11-11 08:13:48 +11:00
parent 77014d035b
commit 47aacfd6d1
7 changed files with 802 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -439,3 +439,115 @@ I am ready for the task you are about to deliver; nothing in the tree is half-ch
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/paperclip-tuios-harness-sam-s-coding-harness-office-board-wo|Paperclip-TUIOS harness (sam's coding harness: office/board/work screens)]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-paperclipai-2026-11-10-10-01-16|Rich discovery: paperclipai 2026-11-10 10:01:16]]
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|paperclipai]]
---
## Update (2026-11-10 21:03:21)
## Rich discovery update (2026-11-10 21:03:21)
Advice only — nothing built. Written into `docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md` as well.
## Your picker, and what it actually writes
`pi-config` registers five commands — `/config-add`, `/config-remove`, `/config-list`, `/config-show`, `/config-setup` — and `picker.ts` is the overlay: a filtered list of `~/.agents/skills` and `~/.agents/extensions` showing which are active in the project and which are active globally.
What the commands change is plain JSON:
```
<project>/.pi/settings.json project settings ("-l" mode)
~/.pi/agent/settings.json global settings
```
in the shape:
```json
{"packages": [
"npm:pi-memctx",
{"source": "git:https://gitea…/pi-config", "extensions": ["extensions/pi-config/index.ts", "extensions/tavily-search/index.ts"]},
{"source": "/home/sam/.agents", "skills": ["nixos-workflow"], "extensions": []}
]}
```
So yes: **that JSON is the interface**, and anything that can write a file can compose an agent's context exactly as the picker does. The real question is which of those files Pi actually reads on a Paperclip run.
## What Paperclip actually runs
From the installed `@paperclipai/adapter-pi-local`:
```
pi --mode json --append-system-prompt <rendered>
--provider <p> --model <m> --thinking <t>
--tools read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls
--session ~/.pi/paperclips/<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl
--skill <a directory built from that agent's desired skills>
```
Four consequences:
1. **Skills are already per agent** — `desiredSkills` and `POST /api/agents/{id}/skills/sync`. That is the supported lever, and the `--skill` directory is built from it.
2. **The isolation leaks.** Injected skills are symlinked into the *shared* `~/.pi/agent/skills` and are not removed when another agent runs, and `--no-skills` is not passed. A skill one agent had can remain visible to another.
3. **The tool list is fixed** at `read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls`. An agent cannot gain a tool by being handed an extension.
4. **Project-local `.pi/settings.json` is unlikely to be honoured for Paperclip runs.** Pi loads project settings only from a trusted path, and `~/.pi/agent/trust.json` has 14 entries — none is a Paperclip worktree or `~/paperclip-agents`. And a worktree path changes every task (`…/worktrees/AUD-165-…`), so there is nothing stable to trust.
That is the direct answer to your "if it uses /.pi in each folder it might be possible" — it *is* possible for you at a terminal, and *not reliable* for a Paperclip-spawned Pi, for two independent reasons.
## So, honestly
- **Identity, instructions, model, budget, skills: Paperclip.** They are already per agent, and the instructions bundle at `~/.paperclip/instances/default/companies/<co>/agents/<id>/instructions/AGENTS.md` is your real per-agent context control.
- **Extensions: one global set.** There is no per-agent extension mechanism in this adapter. Pretending otherwise gives you agents whose behaviour depends on which one ran last.
- **Folder-level `.pi/settings.json`: useful for you, not for the factory.** Keep it for when you open Pi in a folder by hand.
- **If per-agent extensions are genuinely wanted**, the change belongs in the adapter — a per-agent config directory, plus `--no-skills` with an explicit set and stale links removed. That is a Paperclip feature request, not something a terminal can arrange from outside.
## Seeing the agents does give you their history
- `~/.pi/paperclips/*.jsonl` — **178 session files** here, one per run, named `<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl`, each the full conversation.
- `GET /api/agents/{id}/task-sessions` maps a task to its session file and working directory.
- The run log is already visible in `Agents>agents`; `runtime-state` gives current state.
So an `Agents>history` panel is feasible with no new plumbing: list an agent's sessions, open one, render the transcript, link back to the task. Read-only, and the natural next panel after your tests.
Committed as `77014d0` — documentation only, nothing in the running layout changed.
## Source paths observed
- `etc/profiles/per-user/sam/bin/pi`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/bin/pi`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/compaction.md`
- `.pi/agent/settings.json`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/packages.md`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/sdk.md`
- `github.com/user/repo`
- `.pi/agent/skills`
- `home/sam/.local/share/tuios/worktrees/office-test-1/card-t1-build-skeleton-and-13ob`
- `home/sam/.local/share/tuios/worktrees/office-test-1/card-t2-recipe-content-3yto`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/general_chat/chat_chat`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/devops`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/neovim_config`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/nixos_config`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/central_ai_llm_master`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/drone_fire_fighting`
- `home/sam/.pi/paperclips/2026-10-16T01-58-49-725Z-403de1f7-645c-4d35-bc7e-19b01d77bacc.jsonl`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/artemis_control`
- `tmp/pc-sandbox-2026-11-10/.paperclip/worktrees/AUD-166-add-a-changelog-entry-for-the-harness`
- `home/sam/.pi/paperclips/2026-11-10T04-55-52`
- `extensions/pi-config/index.ts`
- `extensions/tavily-search/index.ts`
- `home/sam/.agents`
- `.pi/agent/trust.json`
- `.paperclip/instances/default/companies`
## Evidence
- Confidence: 84%
- Reason: Update component/repository context with detailed discovered structure and configuration
## Related learned memories <!-- same-turn-2026-11-10 21:03:21 -->
- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Pi-local adapter constraints: fixed tool list and leaking skill symlinks]]
- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Committed docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md advise on Paperclip vs Pi config ownership]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/paperclip-pi-local-adapter-config-resolution-limits-and-agen|Paperclip Pi-local adapter: config resolution limits and agent history sources]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-pi-2026-11-10-21-03-21|Rich discovery: .pi 2026-11-10 21:03:21]]
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|.pi]]
- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|.pi deployment operations]]

View File

@@ -460,3 +460,95 @@ I am ready for the task you are about to deliver; nothing in the tree is half-ch
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/paperclip-tuios-harness-sam-s-coding-harness-office-board-wo|Paperclip-TUIOS harness (sam's coding harness: office/board/work screens)]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-paperclipai-2026-11-10-10-01-16|Rich discovery: paperclipai 2026-11-10 10:01:16]]
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|paperclipai]]
---
## Update (2026-11-10 21:03:21)
Advice-only turn: no code built, no running layout changed.
Deliverable: documentation added to `docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md` explaining how Pi agent configuration resolves under Paperclip.
Key content: picker.ts / pi-config command interface writes plain JSON to `<project>/.pi/settings.json` or `~/.pi/agent/settings.json`; the Paperclip adapter-pi-local command line; four consequences (per-agent skills via desiredSkills, skill symlink leak into shared ~/.pi/agent/skills, fixed tool list, project settings not honoured due to trust); recommendations (Paperclip owns identity/instructions/model/budget/skills; extensions global only; folder settings manual-only; per-agent extensions = adapter feature request); agent history sources (~/.pi/paperclips/*.jsonl, 178 files; GET /api/agents/{id}/task-sessions; runtime-state).
Commit: `77014d0` — documentation only.
## Detailed deliverable from completed turn
Advice only — nothing built. Written into `docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md` as well.
## Your picker, and what it actually writes
`pi-config` registers five commands — `/config-add`, `/config-remove`, `/config-list`, `/config-show`, `/config-setup` — and `picker.ts` is the overlay: a filtered list of `~/.agents/skills` and `~/.agents/extensions` showing which are active in the project and which are active globally.
What the commands change is plain JSON:
```
<project>/.pi/settings.json project settings ("-l" mode)
~/.pi/agent/settings.json global settings
```
in the shape:
```json
{"packages": [
"npm:pi-memctx",
{"source": "git:https://gitea…/pi-config", "extensions": ["extensions/pi-config/index.ts", "extensions/tavily-search/index.ts"]},
{"source": "/home/sam/.agents", "skills": ["nixos-workflow"], "extensions": []}
]}
```
So yes: **that JSON is the interface**, and anything that can write a file can compose an agent's context exactly as the picker does. The real question is which of those files Pi actually reads on a Paperclip run.
## What Paperclip actually runs
From the installed `@paperclipai/adapter-pi-local`:
```
pi --mode json --append-system-prompt <rendered>
--provider <p> --model <m> --thinking <t>
--tools read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls
--session ~/.pi/paperclips/<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl
--skill <a directory built from that agent's desired skills>
```
Four consequences:
1. **Skills are already per agent** — `desiredSkills` and `POST /api/agents/{id}/skills/sync`. That is the supported lever, and the `--skill` directory is built from it.
2. **The isolation leaks.** Injected skills are symlinked into the *shared* `~/.pi/agent/skills` and are not removed when another agent runs, and `--no-skills` is not passed. A skill one agent had can remain visible to another.
3. **The tool list is fixed** at `read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls`. An agent cannot gain a tool by being handed an extension.
4. **Project-local `.pi/settings.json` is unlikely to be honoured for Paperclip runs.** Pi loads project settings only from a trusted path, and `~/.pi/agent/trust.json` has 14 entries — none is a Paperclip worktree or `~/paperclip-agents`. And a worktree path changes every task (`…/worktrees/AUD-165-…`), so there is nothing stable to trust.
That is the direct answer to your "if it uses /.pi in each folder it might be possible" — it *is* possible for you at a terminal, and *not reliable* for a Paperclip-spawned Pi, for two independent reasons.
## So, honestly
- **Identity, instructions, model, budget, skills: Paperclip.** They are already per agent, and the instructions bundle at `~/.paperclip/instances/default/companies/<co>/agents/<id>/instructions/AGENTS.md` is your real per-agent context control.
- **Extensions: one global set.** There is no per-agent extension mechanism in this adapter. Pretending otherwise gives you agents whose behaviour depends on which one ran last.
- **Folder-level `.pi/settings.json`: useful for you, not for the factory.** Keep it for when you open Pi in a folder by hand.
- **If per-agent extensions are genuinely wanted**, the change belongs in the adapter — a per-agent config directory, plus `--no-skills` with an explicit set and stale links removed. That is a Paperclip feature request, not something a terminal can arrange from outside.
## Seeing the agents does give you their history
- `~/.pi/paperclips/*.jsonl` — **178 session files** here, one per run, named `<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl`, each the full conversation.
- `GET /api/agents/{id}/task-sessions` maps a task to its session file and working directory.
- The run log is already visible in `Agents>agents`; `runtime-state` gives current state.
So an `Agents>history` panel is feasible with no new plumbing: list an agent's sessions, open one, render the transcript, link back to the task. Read-only, and the natural next panel after your tests.
Committed as `77014d0` — documentation only, nothing in the running layout changed.
## Evidence
- Confidence: 90%
- Reason: Records what was delivered and where, plus commit id.; enriched with final-answer detail because persistence should be reusable
## Related learned memories <!-- same-turn-2026-11-10 21:03:21 -->
- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Pi-local adapter constraints: fixed tool list and leaking skill symlinks]]
- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Committed docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md advise on Paperclip vs Pi config ownership]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/paperclip-pi-local-adapter-config-resolution-limits-and-agen|Paperclip Pi-local adapter: config resolution limits and agent history sources]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-pi-2026-11-10-21-03-21|Rich discovery: .pi 2026-11-10 21:03:21]]
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|.pi]]
- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|.pi deployment operations]]

View File

@@ -1576,3 +1576,232 @@ The functional test list I proposed is in the previous message — create, assig
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-ready-for-tomorrow-s-tests-everything-is-runn|Rich discovery: ready-for-tomorrow-s-tests-everything-is-running-and-rebuilt 2026-11-10 10:48:39]]
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/ready-for-tomorrow-s-tests-everything-is-running-and-rebuilt|ready-for-tomorrow-s-tests-everything-is-running-and-rebuilt]]
- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|ready-for-tomorrow-s-tests-everything-is-running-and-rebuilt repository structure and configuration patterns]]
---
## Update (2026-11-10 21:03:21)
From installed @paperclipai/adapter-pi-local invocation observed in this workspace:
- Tool set is hard-coded: `--tools read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls`. An agent cannot gain extra tools by installing an extension.
- Injected skills are symlinked into the shared `~/.pi/agent/skills` directory and are not cleaned up when a different agent runs; `--no-skills` is not passed. A skill installed for one agent can remain visible to others.
- Per-agent skills ARE supported via `desiredSkills` + `POST /api/agents/{id}/skills/sync`, which builds the agent-specific `--skill` directory.
- Project-local `.pi/settings.json` is unlikely to be honoured for Paperclip runs: Pi only loads it from trusted paths, `~/.pi/agent/trust.json` had 14 entries, none matching a Paperclip worktree or `~/paperclip-agents`, and worktree paths vary per task.
- Per-agent extensions would need an adapter change: per-agent config directory, `--no-skills` with an explicit skill set, and stale symlink removal.
Source docs read from `/nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/` (packages.md, sdk.md, skills docs) and `@paperclipai/adapter-pi-local` source.
## Evidence
- Confidence: 85%
- Reason: Concrete adapter behaviour and isolation caveats useful for future work.
---
## Update (2026-11-10 21:03:21)
- Installed Pi CLI: `/nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/bin/pi`, also on PATH at `/etc/profiles/per-user/sam/bin/pi` (Nix profile).
- Monorepo layout at `<store>/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/` with CHANGELOG.md, dist, docs, examples, node_modules, npm-shrinkwrap.json, package.json, README.md.
- Pi settings precedence: user global `~/.pi/agent/settings.json`; project `<cwd>/.pi/settings.json` (project settings shared with team; Pi auto-installs missing packages after project is trusted). `pi install -l` / `pi remove -l` write project settings; default writes global. `pi config -l` starts in project-overrides mode with inherited global resources dimmed.
- Skills discovery order/locations (documented): `~/.pi/agent/skills/`, `~/.agents/skills/`, project `.pi/skills/`, `.agents/skills/` in cwd and ancestors (up to git root), packages (`skills/` dirs or `pi.skills` in package.json), settings `skills` array, CLI `--skill <path>` (repeatable, additive even with --no-skills). Root `.md` files discovered as individual skills in `~/.pi/agent/skills/` and `.pi/skills/`; ignored at root of `~/.agents/skills/` and project `.agents/skills/`; dirs containing SKILL.md discovered recursively. `--no-skills` disables discovery.
- Temporary trial installs: `pi -e npm:@foo/bar`, `pi -e git:github.com/user/repo`.
- Compaction defaults (docs/compaction.md): reserveTokens 16384, keepRecentTokens 20k, configurable in `~/.pi/agent/settings.json` or `<project>/.pi/settings.json`.
## Evidence
- Confidence: 85%
- Reason: Durable environment and configuration facts about installed Pi on this machine.
---
## Update (2026-11-10 21:03:21)
- Session transcripts: `~/.pi/paperclips/*.jsonl`, count 178 at time of check. Filename pattern `<ISO-timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl`. Each file is JSONL v3; first record `{"type":"session","version":3,"id":...,"timestamp":...,"cwd":...}` followed by records like `{"type":"model_change","provider":"omni","modelId":"deepseek/deeps..."}`.
- `GET /api/agents/{id}/task-sessions` returns task-to-session mapping with fields: id, companyId, agentId, adapterType (e.g. `pi_local`), taskKey, sessionParamsJson ({cwd: `/tmp/pc-sandbox-<date>/.paperclip/worktrees/<task-slug>`, sessionId: path to jsonl}).
- `runtime-state` gives current agent state; run log visible in Agents>agents UI.
- A read-only `Agents>history` panel is feasible: list sessions per agent, open transcript, link back to task. No new plumbing required.
## Detailed observations from completed turn
Advice only — nothing built. Written into `docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md` as well.
## Your picker, and what it actually writes
`pi-config` registers five commands — `/config-add`, `/config-remove`, `/config-list`, `/config-show`, `/config-setup` — and `picker.ts` is the overlay: a filtered list of `~/.agents/skills` and `~/.agents/extensions` showing which are active in the project and which are active globally.
What the commands change is plain JSON:
```
<project>/.pi/settings.json project settings ("-l" mode)
~/.pi/agent/settings.json global settings
```
in the shape:
```json
{"packages": [
"npm:pi-memctx",
{"source": "git:https://gitea…/pi-config", "extensions": ["extensions/pi-config/index.ts", "extensions/tavily-search/index.ts"]},
{"source": "/home/sam/.agents", "skills": ["nixos-workflow"], "extensions": []}
]}
```
So yes: **that JSON is the interface**, and anything that can write a file can compose an agent's context exactly as the picker does. The real question is which of those files Pi actually reads on a Paperclip run.
## What Paperclip actually runs
From the installed `@paperclipai/adapter-pi-local`:
```
pi --mode json --append-system-prompt <rendered>
--provider <p> --model <m> --thinking <t>
--tools read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls
--session ~/.pi/paperclips/<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl
--skill <a directory built from that agent's desired skills>
```
Four consequences:
1. **Skills are already per agent** — `desiredSkills` and `POST /api/agents/{id}/skills/sync`. That is the supported lever, and the `--skill` directory is built from it.
2. **The isolation leaks.** Injected skills are symlinked into the *shared* `~/.pi/agent/skills` and are not removed when another agent runs, and `--no-skills` is not passed. A skill one agent had can remain visible to another.
3. **The tool list is fixed** at `read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls`. An agent cannot gain a tool by being handed an extension.
4. **Project-local `.pi/settings.json` is unlikely to be honoured for Paperclip runs.** Pi loads project settings only from a trusted path, and `~/.pi/agent/trust.json` has 14 entries — none is a Paperclip worktree or `~/paperclip-agents`. And a worktree path changes every task (`…/worktrees/AUD-165-…`), so there is nothing stable to trust.
That is the direct answer to your "if it uses /.pi in each folder it might be possible" — it *is* possible for you at a terminal, and *not reliable* for a Paperclip-spawned Pi, for two independent reasons.
## So, honestly
- **Identity, instructions, model, budget, skills: Paperclip.** They are already per agent, and the instructions bundle at `~/.paperclip/instances/default/companies/<co>/agents/<id>/instructions/AGENTS.md` is your real per-agent context control.
- **Extensions: one global set.** There is no per-agent extension mechanism in this adapter. Pretending otherwise gives you agents whose behaviour depends on which one ran last.
- **Folder-level `.pi/settings.json`: useful for you, not for the factory.** Keep it for when you open Pi in a folder by hand.
- **If per-agent extensions are genuinely wanted**, the change belongs in the adapter — a per-agent config directory, plus `--no-skills` with an explicit set and stale links removed. That is a Paperclip feature request, not something a terminal can arrange from outside.
## Seeing the agents does give you their history
- `~/.pi/paperclips/*.jsonl` — **178 session files** here, one per run, named `<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl`, each the full conversation.
- `GET /api/agents/{id}/task-sessions` maps a task to its session file and working directory.
- The run log is already visible in `Agents>agents`; `runtime-state` gives current state.
So an `Agents>history` panel is feasible with no new plumbing: list an agent's sessions, open one, render the transcript, link back to the task. Read-only, and the natural next panel after your tests.
Committed as `77014d0` — documentation only, nothing in the running layout changed.
## Evidence
- Confidence: 85%
- Reason: Concrete paths, counts, and API shape for building history features.; enriched with final-answer detail because persistence should be reusable
---
## Update (2026-11-10 21:03:21)
## Structural/configuration observations (2026-11-10 21:03:21)
Advice only — nothing built. Written into `docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md` as well.
## Your picker, and what it actually writes
`pi-config` registers five commands — `/config-add`, `/config-remove`, `/config-list`, `/config-show`, `/config-setup` — and `picker.ts` is the overlay: a filtered list of `~/.agents/skills` and `~/.agents/extensions` showing which are active in the project and which are active globally.
What the commands change is plain JSON:
```
<project>/.pi/settings.json project settings ("-l" mode)
~/.pi/agent/settings.json global settings
```
in the shape:
```json
{"packages": [
"npm:pi-memctx",
{"source": "git:https://gitea…/pi-config", "extensions": ["extensions/pi-config/index.ts", "extensions/tavily-search/index.ts"]},
{"source": "/home/sam/.agents", "skills": ["nixos-workflow"], "extensions": []}
]}
```
So yes: **that JSON is the interface**, and anything that can write a file can compose an agent's context exactly as the picker does. The real question is which of those files Pi actually reads on a Paperclip run.
## What Paperclip actually runs
From the installed `@paperclipai/adapter-pi-local`:
```
pi --mode json --append-system-prompt <rendered>
--provider <p> --model <m> --thinking <t>
--tools read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls
--session ~/.pi/paperclips/<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl
--skill <a directory built from that agent's desired skills>
```
Four consequences:
1. **Skills are already per agent** — `desiredSkills` and `POST /api/agents/{id}/skills/sync`. That is the supported lever, and the `--skill` directory is built from it.
2. **The isolation leaks.** Injected skills are symlinked into the *shared* `~/.pi/agent/skills` and are not removed when another agent runs, and `--no-skills` is not passed. A skill one agent had can remain visible to another.
3. **The tool list is fixed** at `read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls`. An agent cannot gain a tool by being handed an extension.
4. **Project-local `.pi/settings.json` is unlikely to be honoured for Paperclip runs.** Pi loads project settings only from a trusted path, and `~/.pi/agent/trust.json` has 14 entries — none is a Paperclip worktree or `~/paperclip-agents`. And a worktree path changes every task (`…/worktrees/AUD-165-…`), so there is nothing stable to trust.
That is the direct answer to your "if it uses /.pi in each folder it might be possible" — it *is* possible for you at a terminal, and *not reliable* for a Paperclip-spawned Pi, for two independent reasons.
## So, honestly
- **Identity, instructions, model, budget, skills: Paperclip.** They are already per agent, and the instructions bundle at `~/.paperclip/instances/default/companies/<co>/agents/<id>/instructions/AGENTS.md` is your real per-agent context control.
- **Extensions: one global set.** There is no per-agent extension mechanism in this adapter. Pretending otherwise gives you agents whose behaviour depends on which one ran last.
- **Folder-level `.pi/settings.json`: useful for you, not for the factory.** Keep it for when you open Pi in a folder by hand.
- **If per-agent extensions are genuinely wanted**, the change belongs in the adapter — a per-agent config directory, plus `--no-skills` with an explicit set and stale links removed. That is a Paperclip feature request, not something a terminal can arrange from outside.
## Seeing the agents does give you their history
- `~/.pi/paperclips/*.jsonl` — **178 session files** here, one per run, named `<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl`, each the full conversation.
- `GET /api/agents/{id}/task-sessions` maps a task to its session file and working directory.
- The run log is already visible in `Agents>agents`; `runtime-state` gives current state.
So an `Agents>history` panel is feasible with no new plumbing: list an agent's sessions, open one, render the transcript, link back to the task. Read-only, and the natural next panel after your tests.
Committed as `77014d0` — documentation only, nothing in the running layout changed.
## Source paths observed
- `etc/profiles/per-user/sam/bin/pi`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/bin/pi`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/compaction.md`
- `.pi/agent/settings.json`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/packages.md`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/sdk.md`
- `github.com/user/repo`
- `.pi/agent/skills`
- `home/sam/.local/share/tuios/worktrees/office-test-1/card-t1-build-skeleton-and-13ob`
- `home/sam/.local/share/tuios/worktrees/office-test-1/card-t2-recipe-content-3yto`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/general_chat/chat_chat`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/devops`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/neovim_config`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/nixos_config`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/central_ai_llm_master`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/drone_fire_fighting`
- `home/sam/.pi/paperclips/2026-10-16T01-58-49-725Z-403de1f7-645c-4d35-bc7e-19b01d77bacc.jsonl`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/artemis_control`
- `tmp/pc-sandbox-2026-11-10/.paperclip/worktrees/AUD-166-add-a-changelog-entry-for-the-harness`
- `home/sam/.pi/paperclips/2026-11-10T04-55-52`
- `extensions/pi-config/index.ts`
- `extensions/tavily-search/index.ts`
- `home/sam/.agents`
- `.pi/agent/trust.json`
- `.paperclip/instances/default/companies`
## Evidence
- Confidence: 82%
- Reason: Captured factual repo structure/configuration patterns from rich discovery
## Related learned memories <!-- same-turn-2026-11-10 21:03:21 -->
- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Pi-local adapter constraints: fixed tool list and leaking skill symlinks]]
- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Committed docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md advise on Paperclip vs Pi config ownership]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/paperclip-pi-local-adapter-config-resolution-limits-and-agen|Paperclip Pi-local adapter: config resolution limits and agent history sources]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-pi-2026-11-10-21-03-21|Rich discovery: .pi 2026-11-10 21:03:21]]
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|.pi]]
- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|.pi deployment operations]]

View File

@@ -403,3 +403,115 @@ I am ready for the task you are about to deliver; nothing in the tree is half-ch
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/paperclip-tuios-harness-sam-s-coding-harness-office-board-wo|Paperclip-TUIOS harness (sam's coding harness: office/board/work screens)]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-paperclipai-2026-11-10-10-01-16|Rich discovery: paperclipai 2026-11-10 10:01:16]]
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|paperclipai]]
---
## Update (2026-11-10 21:03:21)
## Deployment/runbook details discovered (2026-11-10 21:03:21)
Advice only — nothing built. Written into `docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md` as well.
## Your picker, and what it actually writes
`pi-config` registers five commands — `/config-add`, `/config-remove`, `/config-list`, `/config-show`, `/config-setup` — and `picker.ts` is the overlay: a filtered list of `~/.agents/skills` and `~/.agents/extensions` showing which are active in the project and which are active globally.
What the commands change is plain JSON:
```
<project>/.pi/settings.json project settings ("-l" mode)
~/.pi/agent/settings.json global settings
```
in the shape:
```json
{"packages": [
"npm:pi-memctx",
{"source": "git:https://gitea…/pi-config", "extensions": ["extensions/pi-config/index.ts", "extensions/tavily-search/index.ts"]},
{"source": "/home/sam/.agents", "skills": ["nixos-workflow"], "extensions": []}
]}
```
So yes: **that JSON is the interface**, and anything that can write a file can compose an agent's context exactly as the picker does. The real question is which of those files Pi actually reads on a Paperclip run.
## What Paperclip actually runs
From the installed `@paperclipai/adapter-pi-local`:
```
pi --mode json --append-system-prompt <rendered>
--provider <p> --model <m> --thinking <t>
--tools read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls
--session ~/.pi/paperclips/<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl
--skill <a directory built from that agent's desired skills>
```
Four consequences:
1. **Skills are already per agent** — `desiredSkills` and `POST /api/agents/{id}/skills/sync`. That is the supported lever, and the `--skill` directory is built from it.
2. **The isolation leaks.** Injected skills are symlinked into the *shared* `~/.pi/agent/skills` and are not removed when another agent runs, and `--no-skills` is not passed. A skill one agent had can remain visible to another.
3. **The tool list is fixed** at `read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls`. An agent cannot gain a tool by being handed an extension.
4. **Project-local `.pi/settings.json` is unlikely to be honoured for Paperclip runs.** Pi loads project settings only from a trusted path, and `~/.pi/agent/trust.json` has 14 entries — none is a Paperclip worktree or `~/paperclip-agents`. And a worktree path changes every task (`…/worktrees/AUD-165-…`), so there is nothing stable to trust.
That is the direct answer to your "if it uses /.pi in each folder it might be possible" — it *is* possible for you at a terminal, and *not reliable* for a Paperclip-spawned Pi, for two independent reasons.
## So, honestly
- **Identity, instructions, model, budget, skills: Paperclip.** They are already per agent, and the instructions bundle at `~/.paperclip/instances/default/companies/<co>/agents/<id>/instructions/AGENTS.md` is your real per-agent context control.
- **Extensions: one global set.** There is no per-agent extension mechanism in this adapter. Pretending otherwise gives you agents whose behaviour depends on which one ran last.
- **Folder-level `.pi/settings.json`: useful for you, not for the factory.** Keep it for when you open Pi in a folder by hand.
- **If per-agent extensions are genuinely wanted**, the change belongs in the adapter — a per-agent config directory, plus `--no-skills` with an explicit set and stale links removed. That is a Paperclip feature request, not something a terminal can arrange from outside.
## Seeing the agents does give you their history
- `~/.pi/paperclips/*.jsonl` — **178 session files** here, one per run, named `<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl`, each the full conversation.
- `GET /api/agents/{id}/task-sessions` maps a task to its session file and working directory.
- The run log is already visible in `Agents>agents`; `runtime-state` gives current state.
So an `Agents>history` panel is feasible with no new plumbing: list an agent's sessions, open one, render the transcript, link back to the task. Read-only, and the natural next panel after your tests.
Committed as `77014d0` — documentation only, nothing in the running layout changed.
## Source paths observed
- `etc/profiles/per-user/sam/bin/pi`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/bin/pi`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/compaction.md`
- `.pi/agent/settings.json`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/packages.md`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/sdk.md`
- `github.com/user/repo`
- `.pi/agent/skills`
- `home/sam/.local/share/tuios/worktrees/office-test-1/card-t1-build-skeleton-and-13ob`
- `home/sam/.local/share/tuios/worktrees/office-test-1/card-t2-recipe-content-3yto`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/general_chat/chat_chat`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/devops`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/neovim_config`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/nixos_config`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/central_ai_llm_master`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/drone_fire_fighting`
- `home/sam/.pi/paperclips/2026-10-16T01-58-49-725Z-403de1f7-645c-4d35-bc7e-19b01d77bacc.jsonl`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/artemis_control`
- `tmp/pc-sandbox-2026-11-10/.paperclip/worktrees/AUD-166-add-a-changelog-entry-for-the-harness`
- `home/sam/.pi/paperclips/2026-11-10T04-55-52`
- `extensions/pi-config/index.ts`
- `extensions/tavily-search/index.ts`
- `home/sam/.agents`
- `.pi/agent/trust.json`
- `.paperclip/instances/default/companies`
## Evidence
- Confidence: 83%
- Reason: Extracted repeatable deploy/configuration procedure from rich discovery
## Related learned memories <!-- same-turn-2026-11-10 21:03:21 -->
- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Pi-local adapter constraints: fixed tool list and leaking skill symlinks]]
- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Committed docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md advise on Paperclip vs Pi config ownership]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/paperclip-pi-local-adapter-config-resolution-limits-and-agen|Paperclip Pi-local adapter: config resolution limits and agent history sources]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-pi-2026-11-10-21-03-21|Rich discovery: .pi 2026-11-10 21:03:21]]
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|.pi]]
- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|.pi deployment operations]]

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
---
type: session
id: session.paperclip-harness.paperclip-pi-local-adapter-config-resolution-limits-and-agen
title: Paperclip Pi-local adapter: config resolution limits and agent history sources
status: active
source_of_truth: false
freshness: current
last_reviewed: 2026-11-10
tags:
- pack/paperclip-harness
- agent-memory/session
- paperclip
- pi-local-adapter
- agent-config
- skills
- extensions
- session-history
- pi-settings
---
# Paperclip Pi-local adapter: config resolution limits and agent history sources
Discovery turn in the Paperclip harness workspace (papertrail/artemis_control etc.). Advisor question: can an external picker write per-agent config (skills/extensions) for Paperclip-spawned Pi agents?
Key findings (evidence-backed):
- pi-config extension registers 5 commands: /config-add, /config-remove, /config-list, /config-show, /config-setup. picker.ts is an overlay listing ~/.agents/skills and ~/.agents/extensions, marking active in project vs globally.
- Those commands write plain JSON: `<project>/.pi/settings.json` (-l mode) or `~/.pi/agent/settings.json` (default global). Shape: {"packages":[ "npm:pi-memctx", {"source":"git:https://gitea…/pi-config","extensions":[...]}, {"source":"/home/sam/.agents","skills":["nixos-workflow"],"extensions":[]} ]}.
- Installed @paperclipai/adapter-pi-local runs: `pi --mode json --append-system-prompt <rendered> --provider <p> --model <m> --thinking <t> --tools read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls --session ~/.pi/paperclips/<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl --skill <dir built from agent desiredSkills>`.
- Consequences: (1) skills are per-agent via desiredSkills + POST /api/agents/{id}/skills/sync (supported lever); (2) isolation leaks — injected skills symlinked into shared ~/.pi/agent/skills and not removed per run, --no-skills not passed; (3) tool list fixed at read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls — extensions cannot add tools; (4) project-local .pi/settings.json unlikely honoured for Paperclip runs: Pi loads project settings only from trusted path, ~/.pi/agent/trust.json has 14 entries none matching Paperclip worktrees or ~/paperclip-agents, and worktree paths change per task (…/worktrees/AUD-165-…).
- Recommendations: identity/instructions/model/budget/skills controlled by Paperclip per agent (instructions bundle at ~/.paperclip/instances/default/companies/<co>/agents/<id>/instructions/AGENTS.md); extensions only one global set; folder-level .pi/settings.json only for manual terminal use; per-agent extensions would require adapter change (per-agent config dir, --no-skills + explicit set, stale link cleanup) — a Paperclip feature request.
- Agent history available with no new plumbing: ~/.pi/paperclips/*.jsonl (178 session files; name `<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl`, full conversation JSONL v3 with type=session header containing id/timestamp/cwd and model_change records); GET /api/agents/{id}/task-sessions maps task to session file + cwd (task-sessions JSON shows adapterType pi_local, taskKey, sessionParamsJson.cwd under /tmp/pc-sandbox-*/.paperclip/worktrees/<task>, sessionId path). runtime-state gives current state; run log in Agents>agents.
- Written into docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md and committed as 77014d0 (documentation only; no running layout changed).
## Evidence
- Confidence: 90%
- Reason: Rich discovery about adapter behavior, config file locations, and history sources; durable and reusable.
## Related
- [[packs/paperclip-harness/00-system/pi-agent/memory-manifest|Memory Manifest]]
## Related learned memories <!-- same-turn-2026-11-10 21:03:21 -->
- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Pi-local adapter constraints: fixed tool list and leaking skill symlinks]]
- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Committed docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md advise on Paperclip vs Pi config ownership]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/paperclip-pi-local-adapter-config-resolution-limits-and-agen|Paperclip Pi-local adapter: config resolution limits and agent history sources]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-pi-2026-11-10-21-03-21|Rich discovery: .pi 2026-11-10 21:03:21]]
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|.pi]]
- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|.pi deployment operations]]

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
---
type: session
id: session.paperclip-harness.rich-discovery-pi-2026-11-10-21-03-21
title: Rich discovery: .pi 2026-11-10 21:03:21
status: active
source_of_truth: false
freshness: current
last_reviewed: 2026-11-10
tags:
- pack/paperclip-harness
- agent-memory/session
- autolearn
- rich-discovery
- repo/pi
---
# Rich discovery: .pi 2026-11-10 21:03:21
Sanitized rich discovery snapshot captured automatically from the completed turn.
## Source paths observed
- `etc/profiles/per-user/sam/bin/pi`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/bin/pi`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/compaction.md`
- `.pi/agent/settings.json`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/packages.md`
- `nix/store/rg248h9sz8dylm8p6a9w9fj4zrv4sgm5-pi-coding-agent-0.82.1/lib/node_modules/pi-monorepo/docs/sdk.md`
- `github.com/user/repo`
- `.pi/agent/skills`
- `home/sam/.local/share/tuios/worktrees/office-test-1/card-t1-build-skeleton-and-13ob`
- `home/sam/.local/share/tuios/worktrees/office-test-1/card-t2-recipe-content-3yto`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/general_chat/chat_chat`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/devops`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/neovim_config`
- `home/sam/ai_chat/sys_config/nixos_config`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/central_ai_llm_master`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/drone_fire_fighting`
- `home/sam/.pi/paperclips/2026-10-16T01-58-49-725Z-403de1f7-645c-4d35-bc7e-19b01d77bacc.jsonl`
- `home/sam/paseo/projects/artemis_control`
- `tmp/pc-sandbox-2026-11-10/.paperclip/worktrees/AUD-166-add-a-changelog-entry-for-the-harness`
- `home/sam/.pi/paperclips/2026-11-10T04-55-52`
- `extensions/pi-config/index.ts`
- `extensions/tavily-search/index.ts`
- `home/sam/.agents`
- `.pi/agent/trust.json`
- `.paperclip/instances/default/companies`
## Final answer snapshot
Advice only — nothing built. Written into `docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md` as well.
## Your picker, and what it actually writes
`pi-config` registers five commands — `/config-add`, `/config-remove`, `/config-list`, `/config-show`, `/config-setup` — and `picker.ts` is the overlay: a filtered list of `~/.agents/skills` and `~/.agents/extensions` showing which are active in the project and which are active globally.
What the commands change is plain JSON:
```
<project>/.pi/settings.json project settings ("-l" mode)
~/.pi/agent/settings.json global settings
```
in the shape:
```json
{"packages": [
"npm:pi-memctx",
{"source": "git:https://gitea…/pi-config", "extensions": ["extensions/pi-config/index.ts", "extensions/tavily-search/index.ts"]},
{"source": "/home/sam/.agents", "skills": ["nixos-workflow"], "extensions": []}
]}
```
So yes: **that JSON is the interface**, and anything that can write a file can compose an agent's context exactly as the picker does. The real question is which of those files Pi actually reads on a Paperclip run.
## What Paperclip actually runs
From the installed `@paperclipai/adapter-pi-local`:
```
pi --mode json --append-system-prompt <rendered>
--provider <p> --model <m> --thinking <t>
--tools read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls
--session ~/.pi/paperclips/<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl
--skill <a directory built from that agent's desired skills>
```
Four consequences:
1. **Skills are already per agent** — `desiredSkills` and `POST /api/agents/{id}/skills/sync`. That is the supported lever, and the `--skill` directory is built from it.
2. **The isolation leaks.** Injected skills are symlinked into the *shared* `~/.pi/agent/skills` and are not removed when another agent runs, and `--no-skills` is not passed. A skill one agent had can remain visible to another.
3. **The tool list is fixed** at `read,bash,edit,write,grep,find,ls`. An agent cannot gain a tool by being handed an extension.
4. **Project-local `.pi/settings.json` is unlikely to be honoured for Paperclip runs.** Pi loads project settings only from a trusted path, and `~/.pi/agent/trust.json` has 14 entries — none is a Paperclip worktree or `~/paperclip-agents`. And a worktree path changes every task (`…/worktrees/AUD-165-…`), so there is nothing stable to trust.
That is the direct answer to your "if it uses /.pi in each folder it might be possible" — it *is* possible for you at a terminal, and *not reliable* for a Paperclip-spawned Pi, for two independent reasons.
## So, honestly
- **Identity, instructions, model, budget, skills: Paperclip.** They are already per agent, and the instructions bundle at `~/.paperclip/instances/default/companies/<co>/agents/<id>/instructions/AGENTS.md` is your real per-agent context control.
- **Extensions: one global set.** There is no per-agent extension mechanism in this adapter. Pretending otherwise gives you agents whose behaviour depends on which one ran last.
- **Folder-level `.pi/settings.json`: useful for you, not for the factory.** Keep it for when you open Pi in a folder by hand.
- **If per-agent extensions are genuinely wanted**, the change belongs in the adapter — a per-agent config directory, plus `--no-skills` with an explicit set and stale links removed. That is a Paperclip feature request, not something a terminal can arrange from outside.
## Seeing the agents does give you their history
- `~/.pi/paperclips/*.jsonl` — **178 session files** here, one per run, named `<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl`, each the full conversation.
- `GET /api/agents/{id}/task-sessions` maps a task to its session file and working directory.
- The run log is already visible in `Agents>agents`; `runtime-state` gives current state.
So an `Agents>history` panel is feasible with no new plumbing: list an agent's sessions, open one, render the transcript, link back to the task. Read-only, and the natural next panel after your tests.
Committed as `77014d0` — documentation only, nothing in the running layout changed.
## Evidence
- Confidence: 86%
- Reason: Preserve full sanitized discovery detail from a rich investigation turn
## Related
- [[packs/paperclip-harness/00-system/pi-agent/memory-manifest|Memory Manifest]]
## Related learned memories <!-- same-turn-2026-11-10 21:03:21 -->
- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Pi-local adapter constraints: fixed tool list and leaking skill symlinks]]
- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Committed docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md advise on Paperclip vs Pi config ownership]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/paperclip-pi-local-adapter-config-resolution-limits-and-agen|Paperclip Pi-local adapter: config resolution limits and agent history sources]]
- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-pi-2026-11-10-21-03-21|Rich discovery: .pi 2026-11-10 21:03:21]]
- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|.pi]]
- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|.pi deployment operations]]

View File

@@ -414,3 +414,79 @@ Four consequences, and they matter:
A history panel is therefore feasible without new plumbing: list an agent's sessions from
`task-sessions`, open one, and render the JSONL transcript. That is the natural next panel
after the functional tests, and it is read-only.
---
# Correction: per-agent skills are the design, not an accident
The section above gives the wrong impression. Here is the accurate version.
## Each agent has its own skill set, and that is stored in Paperclip
`GET /api/agents/{id}/skills` returns, per agent, `desiredSkills` and the entries actually
managed for it. `Builder` had its own list; `Documenter` has another. Setting it is one call:
```
POST /api/agents/{id}/skills/sync
{ "mode": "replace" | "add" | "remove",
"desiredSkills": ["company/<id>/nixos-workflow", "paperclipai/paperclip/paperclip"] }
```
`replace` means "this agent gets exactly these". At run time the adapter builds a directory
from **that agent's** desired set and passes it as `--skill`, and symlinks those skills into
`~/.pi/agent/skills/<runtimeName>` so the run can find them. So: different agents, different
skills, no problem — this is already the supported path and it needs no picker.
The caveat I over-stated is narrow: the symlinks stay in the shared global directory after a
run, and Paperclip does not pass `--no-skills`, so a skill an agent used once can remain
discoverable by another agent afterwards. That is a leak to know about (and a good argument
for `replace` plus a periodic clean), not "one set for everybody".
Where skills come from: `GET /api/skills/available`, the company list at
`GET /api/companies/{id}/skills`, and the catalog at `GET /api/skills/catalog`. A skill there
can be assigned to any agent with the call above.
## Extensions per agent: yes, through the command
The adapter's configuration document says the agent's command defaults to `pi` and can be set
per agent:
```
adapterConfig.command defaults to "pi"
adapterConfig.env KEY=VALUE pairs
```
So an agent can be given its own wrapper:
```
~/paperclip-agents/builder/pi-wrapper.sh:
#!/bin/sh
exec pi --extension npm:pi-memctx --extension git:https://gitea…/pi-config/extensions/tavily-search/index.ts "$@"
```
and `PATCH /api/agents/{id}` with `{"adapterConfig": {…, "command": "…/pi-wrapper.sh"}}`. The
adapter appends its own arguments (`--mode json`, `--session`, `--skill`, `--tools`,
`--model`) to whatever the command is, so the wrapper is additive and cannot break the run.
`env` is the same lever for environment variables.
That is how per-agent extensions become real today: one wrapper per agent role (`builder`,
`documenter`, `reviewer`), each listing the extensions that role may use. It also gives a
place to set `--no-skills` if strict isolation is wanted, and a place to keep the tool list
deliberately small.
## History: three options, in order of fidelity
1. **Open the real Pi session in a pane.** Paperclip writes every run to
`~/.pi/paperclips/<timestamp>-<agentId>.jsonl` and starts Pi with `--session <file>`. A
pane running `pi --session <that file>` gives the actual conversation, with Pi's own
interface, and can be continued. Highest fidelity, zero new code — a tool-pane entry that
takes a file path. Two writers on one session file is the risk, so this is for sessions
that are finished, or for a deliberate hand-over.
2. **A read-only transcript panel.** Parse the JSONL and draw the messages in `Agents>agents`
as a fourth tab. Integrated, safe, no second process; less faithful than the real thing.
3. **`pi --resume`** in a tool pane, and pick the session from Pi's own list. Simplest of all,
but it makes you find the session by eye.
`GET /api/agents/{id}/task-sessions` maps task → session file and working directory, so option
1 and 2 both have a reliable index and neither needs guessing.