Files
ai-resume/content/edge/l3/edge-front-door.md
Documenter 00fa15f98f Phase 1: content source of truth — 40 documents across six areas
Satisfies the Phase 1 Definition of Done:

- content/ validates cleanly against the frozen schema. `make validate`
  reports OK: 40 document(s) validated, 0 violations.
- Six areas exist, each with an L1 entry: ai-overview, platform-overview,
  edge-overview, products-overview, history-overview, about-overview.
- All six areas have an L2 entry: ai-systems, platform-estate, edge-fleet,
  products-business, history-engagements, about-narrative.
- 28 L3 artefact stubs under content/<area>/l3/. Every artefacts[].url in
  every document resolves to one of them; the validator proves there are no
  dangling references (and a deliberately broken copy exits 1).
- Every metric value traces to a source line in the evidence notes or the
  approved metric set in reference/content-map.md (per-metric citations are
  recorded in the AUD-131 completion comment).
- Every document carries confidence and last_verified=2026-10-26; the
  validator rejects a missing or non-canonical value.
- docs/content-redaction.md records the redaction pass: identifiers, third
  party personal data, credentials and infrastructure detail excluded, with
  reasons, plus the two numbers that are reported rather than smoothed.

Honesty positions held: 3 businesses active (12 adoptions over time),
Where-Woof deployed and pre-market, failures kept in (edge-failures), no
promotion of in-progress work to delivered.

No site code, no templates, no CSS, no rendering (Phase 2).
2026-10-26 17:30:35 +11:00

36 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
id: edge-front-door
area: edge
level: 3
title: "Artefact — Front door · vision · voice · and a rebuild"
claim: "A doorbell that sees a person · describes the image · speaks to the house and to the visitor · and is currently being rebuilt with a time-of-flight sensor."
confidence: in-progress
period: "2020–"
tech: [ESP32, ESP32-CAM, PIR, mmWave, VL53L0X, MiniMax, Piper, Whisper, Apprise]
metrics: [{label: "voice engines in use", value: 2}, {label: "presence sensing inputs", value: "PIR · mmWave · time-of-flight"}]
artefacts: []
public: true
last_verified: 2026-10-26
tags: [edge, doorbell, vision, voice, artefact]
---
# Artefact — Front door · vision · voice · and a rebuild
**Status: in progress.** The device was built and is being rebuilt. The page states this rather than describing it as finished.
## What the artefact is
A door unit with microphone, speaker, camera, button, PIR and mmWave presence. It detects a person, captures an image, logs it, has the image described, and announces to the house who is at the door before offering a spoken greeting; the visitor's reply is captured and played over the house speakers, with an alert pushed to a phone. Voice output ran on one provider and now runs on a cloned voice with a fallback to a local synthesiser.
## What it proves
Vision, voice and actuation in one device under real constraints — latency that a person at a door will tolerate, and a failure mode that must be polite.
## Limits stated on the page
The measurement it is being rebuilt around: presence detection with a time-of-flight ranging sensor, to stop the unit greeting people who are walking past rather than standing at the door. Until the rebuild is finished the honest label is `in-progress`.
## When it is delivered
Phase 7 for photos and the sensor change. Source: evidence notes section 1.