286aa12bb0
Point 7 of the page-wording review. The pages no longer show their data structure as headings, and they no longer explain their own conventions. - Level 1 is one screen: claim, status badge, three figures, the technology row, and one sentence carrying one link. Measured in headless Chrome at 1440x900: 1404-1845 px tall before, exactly 900 px (no scroll) after, on all six area pages. - DocPage: no kicker line, no visible level label, no "Evidence for this page" heading or instruction note, no "Drill-downs" list, no "Status <word> - sentence" footer. The artefact table starts at level 2, under the heading "Artefacts"; the history timeline is level 2 only. - Landing page: "Start here" link text gone, "How to read this site" panel gone, the footer's status-label explainer gone. - Content, presentation only, no claim softened: the leading H1 that duplicated the page title removed from all 41 documents; level 1 bodies reduced to the constraint as ordinary prose plus the way in; "**Status: ...**" prefixes removed from the artefact stubs; "## Drill-downs" and "## Period and confidence" removed from the level 2 pages, with the cross-area links moved into the prose. - The six level 1 claims are now sentences with a subject, and use commas instead of middots. Same facts, no new ones. Not in this commit: the 35 level 2 and 3 claims still use the compact CV style. That is a voice decision for Sam, not a wording tidy-up. make validate: 41 documents, 0 violations. go test ./...: pass. (cherry picked from commit 03009f80fc7815ad7719412e125df9297a6e653f)
30 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
30 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
id: ai-omniroute-routing
|
||
area: ai
|
||
level: 3
|
||
title: "Artefact — Model routing and cost control"
|
||
claim: "Every model call is classified first and sent to the cheapest capable provider — six providers behind one gateway with no direct SDK calls anywhere in the estate."
|
||
confidence: running
|
||
period: "2020–"
|
||
tech: [OmniRoute, JEV, DeepSeek, MiniMax, OpenRouter, Gemini, OpenAI]
|
||
metrics: [{label: "providers in rotation", value: 6}, {label: "gateways", value: 1}]
|
||
artefacts: []
|
||
public: true
|
||
last_verified: 2026-10-26
|
||
tags: [ai, routing, cost, artefact]
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
The routing decision path and a redacted cost table land in Phase 7. No keys or account identifiers are ever published.
|
||
|
||
## What the artefact is
|
||
|
||
The decision path: request arrives, a prompt-analysis step classifies it, the gateway selects a provider and model, and the response returns with its cost recorded. Plus the comparison that demoted local inference for heavy flows — local Ollama measured slower and more expensive under the available hardware than partitioned remote calls.
|
||
|
||
## What it proves
|
||
|
||
Cost control implemented as routing and measurement rather than as a monthly promise, and a single chokepoint where provider access can be audited.
|
||
|
||
## When it is delivered
|
||
|
||
Phase 7. The evidence for the provider list and the local-versus-remote decision is in the evidence notes, section 2 and section 4.
|