Files
ai-resume/content/ai/l3/ai-memory-layers.md
Documenter 286aa12bb0 site: cut the template's own labels out of the pages
Point 7 of the page-wording review. The pages no longer show their data
structure as headings, and they no longer explain their own conventions.

- Level 1 is one screen: claim, status badge, three figures, the technology
  row, and one sentence carrying one link. Measured in headless Chrome at
  1440x900: 1404-1845 px tall before, exactly 900 px (no scroll) after, on
  all six area pages.
- DocPage: no kicker line, no visible level label, no "Evidence for this
  page" heading or instruction note, no "Drill-downs" list, no
  "Status <word> - sentence" footer. The artefact table starts at level 2,
  under the heading "Artefacts"; the history timeline is level 2 only.
- Landing page: "Start here" link text gone, "How to read this site" panel
  gone, the footer's status-label explainer gone.
- Content, presentation only, no claim softened: the leading H1 that
  duplicated the page title removed from all 41 documents; level 1 bodies
  reduced to the constraint as ordinary prose plus the way in;
  "**Status: ...**" prefixes removed from the artefact stubs; "## Drill-downs"
  and "## Period and confidence" removed from the level 2 pages, with the
  cross-area links moved into the prose.
- The six level 1 claims are now sentences with a subject, and use commas
  instead of middots. Same facts, no new ones.

Not in this commit: the 35 level 2 and 3 claims still use the compact CV
style. That is a voice decision for Sam, not a wording tidy-up.

make validate: 41 documents, 0 violations. go test ./...: pass.

(cherry picked from commit 03009f80fc7815ad7719412e125df9297a6e653f)
2026-10-28 15:55:33 +11:00

30 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
id: ai-memory-layers
area: ai
level: 3
title: "Artefact — Memory in two layers · Engram and Headroom"
claim: "Memory is split by purpose — Engram stores what should persist and Headroom keeps what should not persist out of the context window."
confidence: running
period: "2020–"
tech: [Engram, Headroom, SQLite, JEV]
metrics: [{label: "memory layers", value: 2}]
artefacts: []
public: true
last_verified: 2026-10-26
tags: [ai, memory, context, artefact]
---
A redacted session handoff and a before-and-after context measurement land in Phase 7.
## What the artefact is
Engram is local-first storage for curated summaries, decisions, prompts and session handoffs in SQLite, so a conversation can be resumed in any project; it is integrated with JEV for fast compaction. Headroom is token control: it strips, cleanses and analyses code and logs before they reach the model, compressing rather than truncating.
## What it proves
Two distinct problems recognised as two — persistence and window economy — instead of one tool asked to do both.
## When it is delivered
Phase 7. Both tools are part of Sam's own workflow; they are deliberately not part of the public assistant, which is stateless by decision (see `reference/decisions.md` D11).