Files
ai-resume/content/history/history-overview.md
Documenter 00fa15f98f Phase 1: content source of truth — 40 documents across six areas
Satisfies the Phase 1 Definition of Done:

- content/ validates cleanly against the frozen schema. `make validate`
  reports OK: 40 document(s) validated, 0 violations.
- Six areas exist, each with an L1 entry: ai-overview, platform-overview,
  edge-overview, products-overview, history-overview, about-overview.
- All six areas have an L2 entry: ai-systems, platform-estate, edge-fleet,
  products-business, history-engagements, about-narrative.
- 28 L3 artefact stubs under content/<area>/l3/. Every artefacts[].url in
  every document resolves to one of them; the validator proves there are no
  dangling references (and a deliberately broken copy exits 1).
- Every metric value traces to a source line in the evidence notes or the
  approved metric set in reference/content-map.md (per-metric citations are
  recorded in the AUD-131 completion comment).
- Every document carries confidence and last_verified=2026-10-26; the
  validator rejects a missing or non-canonical value.
- docs/content-redaction.md records the redaction pass: identifiers, third
  party personal data, credentials and infrastructure detail excluded, with
  reasons, plus the two numbers that are reported rather than smoothed.

Honesty positions held: 3 businesses active (12 adoptions over time),
Where-Woof deployed and pre-market, failures kept in (edge-failures), no
promotion of in-progress work to delivered.

No site code, no templates, no CSS, no rendering (Phase 2).
2026-10-26 17:30:35 +11:00

26 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
id: history-overview
area: history
level: 1
title: "History"
claim: "Delivered interactive work for twenty-two agencies and twenty-three brands between 1999 and 2014 — the commercial apprenticeship that produced the range."
confidence: historic
period: "1999–2014"
tech: [ActionScript, PHP, JavaScript, MySQL, XML, React, Python, Go, HTMX]
metrics: [{label: "agencies on the client wall", value: 22}, {label: "brands delivered for", value: 23}, {label: "code exhibits kept", value: 6}]
artefacts: [{type: doc, label: "The client wall", url: "content/history/l3/history-client-wall.md"}, {type: doc, label: "Six code exhibits across five eras", url: "content/history/l3/history-code-exhibits.md"}]
public: true
last_verified: 2026-10-26
tags: [history, agencies, brands, career]
---
# History
**Claim.** Fifteen years of agency and product work — national campaigns, bank and broadcaster platforms, betting front-ends, and a lot of rescue missions — for twenty-two agencies and twenty-three brands.
**Status.** Historic. This is the 1999–2014 era, presented as what it was: the commercial apprenticeship that produced the range.
**What it is not.** It is not a Flash page. The languages changed six times across this period — ActionScript, PHP, JavaScript, React, Python, and now Go with HTMX — and the exhibits are chosen to show that rather than to show a decade.
**Start here.** [The engagement record](history-engagements.md) explains the eras, the work and what each exhibit demonstrates.