Files
ai-resume/content/platform/platform-overview.md
Documenter 286aa12bb0 site: cut the template's own labels out of the pages
Point 7 of the page-wording review. The pages no longer show their data
structure as headings, and they no longer explain their own conventions.

- Level 1 is one screen: claim, status badge, three figures, the technology
  row, and one sentence carrying one link. Measured in headless Chrome at
  1440x900: 1404-1845 px tall before, exactly 900 px (no scroll) after, on
  all six area pages.
- DocPage: no kicker line, no visible level label, no "Evidence for this
  page" heading or instruction note, no "Drill-downs" list, no
  "Status <word> - sentence" footer. The artefact table starts at level 2,
  under the heading "Artefacts"; the history timeline is level 2 only.
- Landing page: "Start here" link text gone, "How to read this site" panel
  gone, the footer's status-label explainer gone.
- Content, presentation only, no claim softened: the leading H1 that
  duplicated the page title removed from all 41 documents; level 1 bodies
  reduced to the constraint as ordinary prose plus the way in;
  "**Status: ...**" prefixes removed from the artefact stubs; "## Drill-downs"
  and "## Period and confidence" removed from the level 2 pages, with the
  cross-area links moved into the prose.
- The six level 1 claims are now sentences with a subject, and use commas
  instead of middots. Same facts, no new ones.

Not in this commit: the 35 level 2 and 3 claims still use the compact CV
style. That is a voice decision for Sam, not a wording tidy-up.

make validate: 41 documents, 0 violations. go test ./...: pass.

(cherry picked from commit 03009f80fc7815ad7719412e125df9297a6e653f)
2026-10-28 15:55:33 +11:00

17 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
id: platform-overview
area: platform
level: 1
title: "Platform & Infrastructure"
claim: "Sam runs a multi-machine NixOS and Proxmox estate sized to the hardware rather than the budget: fifty-plus containers, declarative configuration, encrypted backups with a written restore runbook, and public ingress."
confidence: running
period: "2020–"
tech: [NixOS, Proxmox, Docker, Caddy, Tailscale, Borg, Kopia, AWS S3]
metrics: [{label: "containers in the estate", value: 50}, {label: "hosts", value: 4}, {label: "backup tiers", value: "Borg · Kopia · AWS"}]
artefacts: [{type: doc, label: "Declarative multi-host configuration", url: "content/platform/l3/platform-nixos.md"}, {type: doc, label: "Backups and restore runbook", url: "content/platform/l3/platform-backups.md"}, {type: doc, label: "A hand-written Nix package with an exit plan", url: "content/platform/l3/platform-tuios-package.md"}]
public: true
last_verified: 2026-10-26
tags: [platform, devops, nixos, docker, backups]
---
The runtime host is memory-bound rather than CPU-bound, so every service carries a memory cap and is bound to loopback. What runs, where, and what was rejected is on the [estate page](platform-estate.md).