Add 5 pi extensions: pi-subagents, pi-crew, rpiv-pi, pi-interactive-shell, pi-intercom

This commit is contained in:
2026-05-08 15:59:25 +10:00
parent d0d1d9b045
commit 31b4110c87
457 changed files with 85157 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
---
name: delegation-patterns
description: Subagent/team delegation workflow. Use when splitting work across pi-crew teams, direct agents, async background workers, chains, or parallel research/review tasks.
---
# delegation-patterns
Use this skill when deciding how to delegate work.
## Source patterns distilled
- pi-subagents: foreground/background/parallel/chain execution, fork/fresh context, worktree isolation, result watcher
- pi-crew: `src/extension/team-tool/run.ts`, `src/runtime/team-runner.ts`, `src/runtime/task-graph-scheduler.ts`, builtin `teams/*.team.md`, `workflows/*.workflow.md`
- Existing pi-crew skill: `task-packet`
## Rules
- Delegate when tasks span multiple files/subsystems, need planning/review/verification, or can be independently researched.
- Do not parallelize edits to the same file, symbol, migration path, manifest/lockfile, or generated schema unless explicitly sequenced.
- Use read-only explorer/reviewer roles for source audit; implementation workers should receive narrow task packets.
- For async/background work, provide concrete objective, scope, constraints, outputs, and verification. Do not spin in wait loops; retrieve results when notified or when needed.
- For chain-style work, pass dependency outputs forward explicitly and require downstream workers to read upstream artifacts first.
- Use worktree isolation for risky parallel code-changing tasks when repository cleanliness and merge plan allow it.
- Require workers to report blockers and smallest recoverable next action rather than making broad assumptions.
## Task packet checklist
- objective
- scope/paths
- allowed edits vs read-only areas
- constraints and project rules
- dependencies/input artifacts
- expected output artifacts
- acceptance criteria
- verification commands
- escalation conditions
## Anti-patterns
- Sending broad “fix everything” prompts to multiple editors in one workspace.
- Waiting for async workers by sleeping/polling when result notifications exist.
- Letting review workers modify files.
- Claiming completion without durable artifacts or verification evidence.
## Verification
For orchestration changes:
```bash
cd pi-crew
npx tsc --noEmit
node --experimental-strip-types --test test/unit/team-recommendation.test.ts test/unit/task-output-context-security.test.ts test/integration/phase3-runtime.test.ts
npm test
```