clean tests run: pi 1.5.0 model-list shim, panes checked by process, board r refreshes detail, office . accepted

bin/office

@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ def parse(argv):
     of --remote as the folder, which is exactly the kind of bug that only shows
     up when someone uses the flag.
     """
-    opts = {"folder": ".", "project": "", "session": "", "dry": False,
-            "host": "", "no_switch": False, "new": "", "remote": ""}
+    opts = {"folder": ".", "folder_given": False, "project": "", "session": "",
+            "dry": False, "host": "", "no_switch": False, "new": "", "remote": ""}
     positional = []
     i = 0
     while i < len(argv):
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ def parse(argv):
         i += 1
     if positional:
         opts["folder"] = positional[0]
+        opts["folder_given"] = True
     return opts
 
 
@@ -254,7 +255,9 @@ def main():
         h.say(USAGE.strip())
         return 0
     opts = parse(argv)
-    if opts["folder"] in ("", "."):
+    if not opts["folder_given"]:
+        # "." is a real folder: `office . --project <name>` adopts the folder you
+        # are standing in. Only a missing argument is an error.
         raise h.Refused(2, "give the folder: office <folder> --project \"<Name>\"  (office --help)")
     folder = os.path.abspath(os.path.expanduser(opts["folder"]))
     if not os.path.isdir(folder):
@@ -289,7 +292,10 @@ def main():
             return run_on_remote(opts["remote"], folder, opts)
 
     if opts["dry"]:
-        h.say("would create a Paperclip project %r for %s" % (opts["new"] or opts["project"], folder))
+        if opts["new"]:
+            h.say("would create a Paperclip project %r for %s" % (opts["new"], folder))
+        else:
+            h.say("would adopt the Paperclip project %r for %s" % (opts["project"] or "<from .harness/harness.toml>", folder))
         h.say("would write %s" % os.path.join(folder, ".harness", "harness.toml"))
         h.say("would create or reuse session %r and build eight panes there" % session)
         h.say("dry run: nothing was written")