diff --git a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home.md b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home.md index 674bfde..a602527 100644 --- a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home.md +++ b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home.md @@ -719,3 +719,78 @@ Choosing a task here writes the same choice the Board writes, so `Reply>reply` a - runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|navigate tasks and runs inside Work>work and merge safely (paperclip-harness)]] - session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-home-2026-11-11-02-17-44|Rich discovery: home 2026-11-11 02:17:44]] - context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|home]] + + +--- + +## Update (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +## Rich discovery update (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +## Headroom: what the failure actually is, and what you do + +I tested three configurations on a throwaway container on a spare port, so the running one was untouched: + +| Configuration | Result | +|---|---| +| default image (`HEADROOM_BACKEND` unset → `anthropic`) + your router key | `502 proxy_error` | +| plus `OPENAI_API_KEY` | `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` → `404 No active credentials for provider: openai`; `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash` → `502` | +| plus `HEADROOM_BACKEND=openai` | `502 proxy_error` | + +Two things that answer your questions directly: + +- **`openai/` is not OpenAI's model.** In this stack the prefix names the *protocol* to speak — "use the OpenAI-compatible client" — and the rest is the model name your router uses. So `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` means "call the router with its `deepseek-v4-flash` model". That is why I wrote it that way, and it was a guess about headroom's routing, not a fact. +- **The `404 … provider: openai` came from your router, not headroom.** The router read `openai/` as a provider name and had no key for it. So that path was never going to work with our router's ids. + +`/stats` on the test container reported `api_requests: 0` for all of those attempts — headroom refused or failed before forwarding. That is inside headroom's deployment, and it needs someone with its logs open; nothing in our software can fix it. + +**What does work, re-checked:** `POST /v1/compress` answers 200 and reports tokens before and after. That is the endpoint `headroom-bridge` uses, and `headroom-ai` is now installed on `.13`, `.27` and `.51`. + +**So: use Path A, not both.** `Agents>agents` → `)` to extensions → `space` on `headroom-bridge`. That agent, and no other, gets `compress_for_agent`. Path B is yours to fix in the headroom container if you still want automatic compression; I have recorded the three tests and their exact responses so nobody repeats them. + +## The rest + +**Archify in the Obsidian note** — added, with the map URL, the Mermaid source path, the Outline collection and the repository link. Note is now 3,511 bytes at `010 inbox/Paperclip Harness.md` on `.27`. + +**Outline — pushed.** New collection **Paperclip Harness** with five published documents: + +``` +/doc/00-index-o6hhlKTFXR +/doc/01-system-overview-dGpfQOk1vt +/doc/02-configuration-and-environment-redTWei0y2 +/doc/03-code-map-y6KPFbBbIC +/doc/04-agent-runbook-Sd9ZznhBqo +``` + +**Point 4, specifically.** Two tests, both about whether a person can get from "a folder" to "a working set of panes": + +1. **A brand-new project.** An empty folder, a new Paperclip project, then `bin/office /tmp/fresh-project-2026-11-11 --project fresh-project`. Expected: session created, eight panes built, `Shell>shell` in that folder. **This already passed tonight** — except the session opened at 78 columns and `Board>board` correctly said "this workspace needs 80 × 24", which is the too-small screen doing its job, not a failure. The real test is: switch to that session, press `R` to rebuild at full size, create one task, assign it, watch it run, merge it. +2. **An existing folder.** Adopt this repository: `bin/office ~/paseo/projects/paperclip-harness --project `. Expected: `.harness/` appears, nothing existing is overwritten, the panes read *this* repo's tasks. That proves adoption is safe on real code. + +**Pi versions.** `.51` is 0.87.1; `.13` and `.27` are 0.82.1. You rebuilt `.51` — the Go addition there is in place (`go gopls` in `hosts/sam-thinkpad/configuration.nix`, dry-run evaluates). For Pi: on `.13` and `.27`, Pi is the Nix package `pi-coding-agent`, so aligning means bumping that package in each machine's flake and rebuilding. Do you want me to prepare those two bumps (I can edit both flakes and run the dry-run evaluations), or leave `.13`/`.27` on 0.82.1 since they work? + +Committed as `d2cf643` and pushed to Gitea. + +## Source paths observed + +- `nix/store/rgnappqqc5vbq60gza5fflyk84sylwl6-python3-3.14.6/lib/python3.14/json/__init__.py` +- `nix/store/rgnappqqc5vbq60gza5fflyk84sylwl6-python3-3.14.6/lib/python3.14/json/decoder.py` +- `outline.lab.audasmedia.com.au/api/collections.list` +- `home/sam/obsidian/010` +- `gitea.lab.audasmedia.com.au/sam/paperclip-harness.git` +- `paseo/projects/paperclip-harness` +- `hosts/sam-thinkpad/configuration.nix` + +## Evidence + +- Confidence: 84% +- Reason: Update component/repository context with detailed discovered structure and configuration + +## Related learned memories + +- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Paperclip Harness acceptance test plan (Point 4) and Pi/Go host versions]] +- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|publish Paperclip Harness docs to Outline and update Obsidian note]] +- decision: [[packs/paperclip-harness/50-decisions/paperclip-harness-ui-six-workspaces-spec-first-four-panel-li|Paperclip Harness: use Path A (headroom-bridge agent extension), not automatic headroom compression]] +- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Paperclip Harness: docs published to Outline, Obsidian note updated, repo pushed]] +- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-link-2026-11-11-21-45-49|Rich discovery: link. 2026-11-11 21:45:49]] +- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|link.]] diff --git a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups.md b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups.md index 00c4feb..b7663f6 100644 --- a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups.md +++ b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups.md @@ -943,3 +943,39 @@ Vikunja integration ignored per user. - observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Headroom integration paths on Pi]] - action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Delivered paperclip-harness documentation to Gitea, Obsidian, and docs/outline]] - session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/paperclip-harness-docs-and-gitea-publication|paperclip-harness docs and Gitea publication]] + + +--- + +## Update (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +Completed turn delivered three artifacts for the Paperclip Harness project: + +1. **Outline collection created** — "Paperclip Harness" (collection id 4570974e-fb8f-4a87-8fcd-937729a40ed2) with five published docs on host http://outline.lab.audasmedia.com.au: + - /doc/00-index-o6hhlKTFXR + - /doc/01-system-overview-dGpfQOk1vt + - /doc/02-configuration-and-environment-redTWei0y2 + - /doc/03-code-map-y6KPFbBbIC + - /doc/04-agent-runbook-Sd9ZznhBqo + +2. **Obsidian note updated** — `010 inbox/Paperclip Harness.md` on host `.27` (3511 bytes) now includes archify map URL, Mermaid source path, Outline collection reference, and repository link. + +3. **Git push** — commit d2cf643 pushed to `https://gitea.lab.audasmedia.com.au/sam/paperclip-harness.git` main (range e883b11..d2cf643). + +Validation: collection create returned 200; each doc upload returned 200; note file rewrite confirmed via ls/byte count; git push output confirmed. + +Follow-up flagged but not performed: bumping Pi `pi-coding-agent` Nix package on hosts `.13` and `.27` from 0.82.1 to align with `.51` (0.87.1) — awaiting user decision. + +## Evidence + +- Confidence: 90% +- Reason: Concrete completed deliverables with IDs, URLs, paths and commit hash are durable and reusable. + +## Related learned memories + +- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Paperclip Harness acceptance test plan (Point 4) and Pi/Go host versions]] +- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|publish Paperclip Harness docs to Outline and update Obsidian note]] +- decision: [[packs/paperclip-harness/50-decisions/paperclip-harness-ui-six-workspaces-spec-first-four-panel-li|Paperclip Harness: use Path A (headroom-bridge agent extension), not automatic headroom compression]] +- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Paperclip Harness: docs published to Outline, Obsidian note updated, repo pushed]] +- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-link-2026-11-11-21-45-49|Rich discovery: link. 2026-11-11 21:45:49]] +- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|link.]] diff --git a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/50-decisions/paperclip-harness-ui-six-workspaces-spec-first-four-panel-li.md b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/50-decisions/paperclip-harness-ui-six-workspaces-spec-first-four-panel-li.md index def603b..b629654 100644 --- a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/50-decisions/paperclip-harness-ui-six-workspaces-spec-first-four-panel-li.md +++ b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/50-decisions/paperclip-harness-ui-six-workspaces-spec-first-four-panel-li.md @@ -404,3 +404,32 @@ Say go on 1 and I will run the project-docs pass before anything else. - session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/paperclip-harness-headroom-integration-machine-drift-cancel-|paperclip-harness: headroom integration, machine drift, cancel feature, office workflow]] - session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-itself-2026-11-11-08-00-32|Rich discovery: itself 2026-11-11 08:00:32]] - context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/tmp|itself]] + + +--- + +## Update (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +**Decision:** Use Path A — grant `compress_for_agent` to the `headroom-bridge` agent only via `Agents>agents` → `)` extensions → `space` on `headroom-bridge` — rather than enabling both paths. + +**Context:** Headroom's automatic backend compression failed in three tested configurations (502 proxy_error, 404 provider openai, 502), with `/stats` showing `api_requests: 0` (never forwarded). Meanwhile `POST /v1/compress` (the endpoint headroom-bridge uses) works reliably, returning 200 with token counts. + +**Rationale:** The working, verifiable path is the bridge's `/v1/compress` call; the headroom backend failure is inside its own deployment and cannot be fixed from our software. + +**Alternatives considered:** Path B (automatic compression inside headroom container) — deferred; user may still fix it later. + +**Consequences/caveats:** Only the headroom-bridge agent gets `compress_for_agent`; other agents do not compress. Path B remains a separate optional fix requiring access to headroom container logs. + +## Evidence + +- Confidence: 85% +- Reason: Architectural choice with rationale and alternatives, useful for future agents. + +## Related learned memories + +- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Paperclip Harness acceptance test plan (Point 4) and Pi/Go host versions]] +- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|publish Paperclip Harness docs to Outline and update Obsidian note]] +- decision: [[packs/paperclip-harness/50-decisions/paperclip-harness-ui-six-workspaces-spec-first-four-panel-li|Paperclip Harness: use Path A (headroom-bridge agent extension), not automatic headroom compression]] +- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Paperclip Harness: docs published to Outline, Obsidian note updated, repo pushed]] +- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-link-2026-11-11-21-45-49|Rich discovery: link. 2026-11-11 21:45:49]] +- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|link.]] diff --git a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns.md b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns.md index 180860b..8538818 100644 --- a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns.md +++ b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns.md @@ -3643,3 +3643,128 @@ Path B (provider-level, inside the headroom container): its compose file has no - observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Headroom integration paths on Pi]] - action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Delivered paperclip-harness documentation to Gitea, Obsidian, and docs/outline]] - session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/paperclip-harness-docs-and-gitea-publication|paperclip-harness docs and Gitea publication]] + + +--- + +## Update (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +**Acceptance tests for folder→working panes (Point 4):** + +1. **Brand-new project:** empty folder, new Paperclip project, run `bin/office /tmp/fresh-project-2026-11-11 --project fresh-project`. Expected: session created, eight panes built, `Shell>shell` in that folder. Already passed once tonight, except session opened at 78 columns and `Board>board` correctly reported "needs 80 × 24" (small screen behaving correctly). Full test: switch session, press `R` to rebuild at full size, create/assign/run/merge one task. +2. **Existing folder (adoption):** `bin/office ~/paseo/projects/paperclip-harness --project `. Expected: `.harness/` appears, nothing existing overwritten, panes read this repo's tasks. Proves adoption is safe on real code. + +**Version state:** +- Host `.51`: Pi 0.87.1; Go addition in place (`go gopls` in `hosts/sam-thinkpad/configuration.nix`, dry-run evaluates). +- Hosts `.13` and `.27`: Pi 0.82.1 via Nix package `pi-coding-agent`; aligning requires bumping that package in each machine's flake and rebuilding. Awaiting user decision. + +**Host/service facts:** Outline reachable at `http://outline.lab.audasmedia.com.au` (port 3002 returned 404, port 3000 returned 401). Outline API `collections.list` used for discovery (14 collections total). + +## Evidence + +- Confidence: 85% +- Reason: Concrete test procedures and version/environment facts worth preserving. + + +--- + +## Update (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +Tested headroom configurations on a throwaway container (spare port) so the running service was untouched. Results: + +| Configuration | Result | +|---|---| +| default image (`HEADROOM_BACKEND` unset → anthropic) + router key | `502 proxy_error` | +| plus `OPENAI_API_KEY`, model `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` | `404 No active credentials for provider: openai` | +| model `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash` | `502` | +| plus `HEADROOM_BACKEND=openai` | `502 proxy_error` | + +Key facts: +- `openai/` prefix in model id names the *protocol/client* to use, not OpenAI's model. `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` means "call the router with its deepseek-v4-flash model". This was a guess about headroom routing, not documented. +- The `404 ... provider: openai` originates from the router, not headroom: router read `openai/` as a provider and had no key. +- `/stats` on the test container reported `api_requests: 0` for all attempts — headroom failed before forwarding. Fix lies inside headroom's deployment/logs; not fixable from our software. +- Working path re-verified: `POST /v1/compress` returns 200 and reports token counts before/after. This endpoint is what `headroom-bridge` uses. +- `headroom-ai` is now installed on hosts `.13`, `.27`, `.51`. +- Recommendation issued: use Path A only (`Agents>agents` → `)` extensions → `space` on `headroom-bridge`), granting `compress_for_agent` to that agent only; Path B (automatic headroom compression) needs fixing in the headroom container. + +No secret values recorded (an `OL_API_KEY`/router key appeared in tool output but is redacted here). + +## Evidence + +- Confidence: 90% +- Reason: Evidence-backed failure matrix and root-cause distinction, directly reusable to avoid repeating tests. + + +--- + +## Update (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +## Structural/configuration observations (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +## Headroom: what the failure actually is, and what you do + +I tested three configurations on a throwaway container on a spare port, so the running one was untouched: + +| Configuration | Result | +|---|---| +| default image (`HEADROOM_BACKEND` unset → `anthropic`) + your router key | `502 proxy_error` | +| plus `OPENAI_API_KEY` | `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` → `404 No active credentials for provider: openai`; `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash` → `502` | +| plus `HEADROOM_BACKEND=openai` | `502 proxy_error` | + +Two things that answer your questions directly: + +- **`openai/` is not OpenAI's model.** In this stack the prefix names the *protocol* to speak — "use the OpenAI-compatible client" — and the rest is the model name your router uses. So `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` means "call the router with its `deepseek-v4-flash` model". That is why I wrote it that way, and it was a guess about headroom's routing, not a fact. +- **The `404 … provider: openai` came from your router, not headroom.** The router read `openai/` as a provider name and had no key for it. So that path was never going to work with our router's ids. + +`/stats` on the test container reported `api_requests: 0` for all of those attempts — headroom refused or failed before forwarding. That is inside headroom's deployment, and it needs someone with its logs open; nothing in our software can fix it. + +**What does work, re-checked:** `POST /v1/compress` answers 200 and reports tokens before and after. That is the endpoint `headroom-bridge` uses, and `headroom-ai` is now installed on `.13`, `.27` and `.51`. + +**So: use Path A, not both.** `Agents>agents` → `)` to extensions → `space` on `headroom-bridge`. That agent, and no other, gets `compress_for_agent`. Path B is yours to fix in the headroom container if you still want automatic compression; I have recorded the three tests and their exact responses so nobody repeats them. + +## The rest + +**Archify in the Obsidian note** — added, with the map URL, the Mermaid source path, the Outline collection and the repository link. Note is now 3,511 bytes at `010 inbox/Paperclip Harness.md` on `.27`. + +**Outline — pushed.** New collection **Paperclip Harness** with five published documents: + +``` +/doc/00-index-o6hhlKTFXR +/doc/01-system-overview-dGpfQOk1vt +/doc/02-configuration-and-environment-redTWei0y2 +/doc/03-code-map-y6KPFbBbIC +/doc/04-agent-runbook-Sd9ZznhBqo +``` + +**Point 4, specifically.** Two tests, both about whether a person can get from "a folder" to "a working set of panes": + +1. **A brand-new project.** An empty folder, a new Paperclip project, then `bin/office /tmp/fresh-project-2026-11-11 --project fresh-project`. Expected: session created, eight panes built, `Shell>shell` in that folder. **This already passed tonight** — except the session opened at 78 columns and `Board>board` correctly said "this workspace needs 80 × 24", which is the too-small screen doing its job, not a failure. The real test is: switch to that session, press `R` to rebuild at full size, create one task, assign it, watch it run, merge it. +2. **An existing folder.** Adopt this repository: `bin/office ~/paseo/projects/paperclip-harness --project `. Expected: `.harness/` appears, nothing existing is overwritten, the panes read *this* repo's tasks. That proves adoption is safe on real code. + +**Pi versions.** `.51` is 0.87.1; `.13` and `.27` are 0.82.1. You rebuilt `.51` — the Go addition there is in place (`go gopls` in `hosts/sam-thinkpad/configuration.nix`, dry-run evaluates). For Pi: on `.13` and `.27`, Pi is the Nix package `pi-coding-agent`, so aligning means bumping that package in each machine's flake and rebuilding. Do you want me to prepare those two bumps (I can edit both flakes and run the dry-run evaluations), or leave `.13`/`.27` on 0.82.1 since they work? + +Committed as `d2cf643` and pushed to Gitea. + +## Source paths observed + +- `nix/store/rgnappqqc5vbq60gza5fflyk84sylwl6-python3-3.14.6/lib/python3.14/json/__init__.py` +- `nix/store/rgnappqqc5vbq60gza5fflyk84sylwl6-python3-3.14.6/lib/python3.14/json/decoder.py` +- `outline.lab.audasmedia.com.au/api/collections.list` +- `home/sam/obsidian/010` +- `gitea.lab.audasmedia.com.au/sam/paperclip-harness.git` +- `paseo/projects/paperclip-harness` +- `hosts/sam-thinkpad/configuration.nix` + +## Evidence + +- Confidence: 82% +- Reason: Captured factual repo structure/configuration patterns from rich discovery + +## Related learned memories + +- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Paperclip Harness acceptance test plan (Point 4) and Pi/Go host versions]] +- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|publish Paperclip Harness docs to Outline and update Obsidian note]] +- decision: [[packs/paperclip-harness/50-decisions/paperclip-harness-ui-six-workspaces-spec-first-four-panel-li|Paperclip Harness: use Path A (headroom-bridge agent extension), not automatic headroom compression]] +- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Paperclip Harness: docs published to Outline, Obsidian note updated, repo pushed]] +- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-link-2026-11-11-21-45-49|Rich discovery: link. 2026-11-11 21:45:49]] +- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|link.]] diff --git a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations.md b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations.md index 908023d..6961bb8 100644 --- a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations.md +++ b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations.md @@ -1149,3 +1149,150 @@ Committed as `70e1f55`. - session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/paperclip-harness-discovery-snapshot-overlay-check-sh-headro|paperclip-harness discovery snapshot: overlay, check.sh, headroom, mouse-1]] - session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-8787-2026-11-11-05-36-08|Rich discovery: 8787 2026-11-11 05:36:08]] - context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/omni|8787]] + + +--- + +## Update (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +**Trigger:** Need to (re)publish project documentation to Outline and refresh the Obsidian index note. + +**Prerequisites:** Outline reachable at http://outline.lab.audasmedia.com.au (API accepts `collections.list`, `collections.create`, doc create at `/api/...`); Obsidian vault on host `.27`; auth token available (do not log it). + +**Steps:** +1. List collections via `GET /api/collections.list` to check for existing target. +2. Create collection via API (POST returns 200). Record the returned collection id. +3. Upload the five docs in order (00-index, 01-system-overview, 02-config-and-env, 03-code-map, 04-agent-runbook). Each returns 200 with a `/doc/` path. +4. Rewrite `010 inbox/Paperclip Harness.md` on `.27` to include archify map URL, Mermaid source path, Outline collection link, and repository link. +5. Verify byte count of note file. +6. Commit and push repo to Gitea: `git push` to `https://gitea.lab.audasmedia.com.au/sam/paperclip-harness.git` main. + +**Known gotchas:** Parsing non-JSON curl output as JSON throws `JSONDecodeError: line 1 column 1` — check HTTP status separately from body. Port 3002 returns 404; port 3000 returns 401 (not Outline). + +**Rollback:** Delete created Outline collection/docs via API; revert git commit. + +## Detailed procedure from completed turn + +## Headroom: what the failure actually is, and what you do + +I tested three configurations on a throwaway container on a spare port, so the running one was untouched: + +| Configuration | Result | +|---|---| +| default image (`HEADROOM_BACKEND` unset → `anthropic`) + your router key | `502 proxy_error` | +| plus `OPENAI_API_KEY` | `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` → `404 No active credentials for provider: openai`; `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash` → `502` | +| plus `HEADROOM_BACKEND=openai` | `502 proxy_error` | + +Two things that answer your questions directly: + +- **`openai/` is not OpenAI's model.** In this stack the prefix names the *protocol* to speak — "use the OpenAI-compatible client" — and the rest is the model name your router uses. So `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` means "call the router with its `deepseek-v4-flash` model". That is why I wrote it that way, and it was a guess about headroom's routing, not a fact. +- **The `404 … provider: openai` came from your router, not headroom.** The router read `openai/` as a provider name and had no key for it. So that path was never going to work with our router's ids. + +`/stats` on the test container reported `api_requests: 0` for all of those attempts — headroom refused or failed before forwarding. That is inside headroom's deployment, and it needs someone with its logs open; nothing in our software can fix it. + +**What does work, re-checked:** `POST /v1/compress` answers 200 and reports tokens before and after. That is the endpoint `headroom-bridge` uses, and `headroom-ai` is now installed on `.13`, `.27` and `.51`. + +**So: use Path A, not both.** `Agents>agents` → `)` to extensions → `space` on `headroom-bridge`. That agent, and no other, gets `compress_for_agent`. Path B is yours to fix in the headroom container if you still want automatic compression; I have recorded the three tests and their exact responses so nobody repeats them. + +## The rest + +**Archify in the Obsidian note** — added, with the map URL, the Mermaid source path, the Outline collection and the repository link. Note is now 3,511 bytes at `010 inbox/Paperclip Harness.md` on `.27`. + +**Outline — pushed.** New collection **Paperclip Harness** with five published documents: + +``` +/doc/00-index-o6hhlKTFXR +/doc/01-system-overview-dGpfQOk1vt +/doc/02-configuration-and-environment-redTWei0y2 +/doc/03-code-map-y6KPFbBbIC +/doc/04-agent-runbook-Sd9ZznhBqo +``` + +**Point 4, specifically.** Two tests, both about whether a person can get from "a folder" to "a working set of panes": + +1. **A brand-new project.** An empty folder, a new Paperclip project, then `bin/office /tmp/fresh-project-2026-11-11 --project fresh-project`. Expected: session created, eight panes built, `Shell>shell` in that folder. **This already passed tonight** — except the session opened at 78 columns and `Board>board` correctly said "this workspace needs 80 × 24", which is the too-small screen doing its job, not a failure. The real test is: switch to that session, press `R` to rebuild at full size, create one task, assign it, watch it run, merge it. +2. **An existing folder.** Adopt this repository: `bin/office ~/paseo/projects/paperclip-harness --project `. Expected: `.harness/` appears, nothing existing is overwritten, the panes read *this* repo's tasks. That proves adoption is safe on real code. + +**Pi versions.** `.51` is 0.87.1; `.13` and `.27` are 0.82.1. You rebuilt `.51` — the Go addition there is in place (`go gopls` in `hosts/sam-thinkpad/configuration.nix`, dry-run evaluates). For Pi: on `.13` and `.27`, Pi is the Nix package `pi-coding-agent`, so aligning means bumping that package in each machine's flake and rebuilding. Do you want me to prepare those two bumps (I can edit both flakes and run the dry-run evaluations), or leave `.13`/`.27` on 0.82.1 since they work? + +Committed as `d2cf643` and pushed to Gitea. + +## Evidence + +- Confidence: 80% +- Reason: Repeatable multi-step procedure with concrete endpoints and caveats.; enriched with final-answer detail because persistence should be reusable + + +--- + +## Update (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +## Deployment/runbook details discovered (2026-11-11 21:45:49) + +## Headroom: what the failure actually is, and what you do + +I tested three configurations on a throwaway container on a spare port, so the running one was untouched: + +| Configuration | Result | +|---|---| +| default image (`HEADROOM_BACKEND` unset → `anthropic`) + your router key | `502 proxy_error` | +| plus `OPENAI_API_KEY` | `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` → `404 No active credentials for provider: openai`; `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash` → `502` | +| plus `HEADROOM_BACKEND=openai` | `502 proxy_error` | + +Two things that answer your questions directly: + +- **`openai/` is not OpenAI's model.** In this stack the prefix names the *protocol* to speak — "use the OpenAI-compatible client" — and the rest is the model name your router uses. So `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` means "call the router with its `deepseek-v4-flash` model". That is why I wrote it that way, and it was a guess about headroom's routing, not a fact. +- **The `404 … provider: openai` came from your router, not headroom.** The router read `openai/` as a provider name and had no key for it. So that path was never going to work with our router's ids. + +`/stats` on the test container reported `api_requests: 0` for all of those attempts — headroom refused or failed before forwarding. That is inside headroom's deployment, and it needs someone with its logs open; nothing in our software can fix it. + +**What does work, re-checked:** `POST /v1/compress` answers 200 and reports tokens before and after. That is the endpoint `headroom-bridge` uses, and `headroom-ai` is now installed on `.13`, `.27` and `.51`. + +**So: use Path A, not both.** `Agents>agents` → `)` to extensions → `space` on `headroom-bridge`. That agent, and no other, gets `compress_for_agent`. Path B is yours to fix in the headroom container if you still want automatic compression; I have recorded the three tests and their exact responses so nobody repeats them. + +## The rest + +**Archify in the Obsidian note** — added, with the map URL, the Mermaid source path, the Outline collection and the repository link. Note is now 3,511 bytes at `010 inbox/Paperclip Harness.md` on `.27`. + +**Outline — pushed.** New collection **Paperclip Harness** with five published documents: + +``` +/doc/00-index-o6hhlKTFXR +/doc/01-system-overview-dGpfQOk1vt +/doc/02-configuration-and-environment-redTWei0y2 +/doc/03-code-map-y6KPFbBbIC +/doc/04-agent-runbook-Sd9ZznhBqo +``` + +**Point 4, specifically.** Two tests, both about whether a person can get from "a folder" to "a working set of panes": + +1. **A brand-new project.** An empty folder, a new Paperclip project, then `bin/office /tmp/fresh-project-2026-11-11 --project fresh-project`. Expected: session created, eight panes built, `Shell>shell` in that folder. **This already passed tonight** — except the session opened at 78 columns and `Board>board` correctly said "this workspace needs 80 × 24", which is the too-small screen doing its job, not a failure. The real test is: switch to that session, press `R` to rebuild at full size, create one task, assign it, watch it run, merge it. +2. **An existing folder.** Adopt this repository: `bin/office ~/paseo/projects/paperclip-harness --project `. Expected: `.harness/` appears, nothing existing is overwritten, the panes read *this* repo's tasks. That proves adoption is safe on real code. + +**Pi versions.** `.51` is 0.87.1; `.13` and `.27` are 0.82.1. You rebuilt `.51` — the Go addition there is in place (`go gopls` in `hosts/sam-thinkpad/configuration.nix`, dry-run evaluates). For Pi: on `.13` and `.27`, Pi is the Nix package `pi-coding-agent`, so aligning means bumping that package in each machine's flake and rebuilding. Do you want me to prepare those two bumps (I can edit both flakes and run the dry-run evaluations), or leave `.13`/`.27` on 0.82.1 since they work? + +Committed as `d2cf643` and pushed to Gitea. + +## Source paths observed + +- `nix/store/rgnappqqc5vbq60gza5fflyk84sylwl6-python3-3.14.6/lib/python3.14/json/__init__.py` +- `nix/store/rgnappqqc5vbq60gza5fflyk84sylwl6-python3-3.14.6/lib/python3.14/json/decoder.py` +- `outline.lab.audasmedia.com.au/api/collections.list` +- `home/sam/obsidian/010` +- `gitea.lab.audasmedia.com.au/sam/paperclip-harness.git` +- `paseo/projects/paperclip-harness` +- `hosts/sam-thinkpad/configuration.nix` + +## Evidence + +- Confidence: 83% +- Reason: Extracted repeatable deploy/configuration procedure from rich discovery + +## Related learned memories + +- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Paperclip Harness acceptance test plan (Point 4) and Pi/Go host versions]] +- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|publish Paperclip Harness docs to Outline and update Obsidian note]] +- decision: [[packs/paperclip-harness/50-decisions/paperclip-harness-ui-six-workspaces-spec-first-four-panel-li|Paperclip Harness: use Path A (headroom-bridge agent extension), not automatic headroom compression]] +- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Paperclip Harness: docs published to Outline, Obsidian note updated, repo pushed]] +- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-link-2026-11-11-21-45-49|Rich discovery: link. 2026-11-11 21:45:49]] +- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|link.]] diff --git a/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-link-2026-11-11-21-45-49.md b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-link-2026-11-11-21-45-49.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a739525 --- /dev/null +++ b/.pi/memory-vault/packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-link-2026-11-11-21-45-49.md @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +--- +type: session +id: session.paperclip-harness.rich-discovery-link-2026-11-11-21-45-49 +title: Rich discovery: link. 2026-11-11 21:45:49 +status: active +source_of_truth: false +freshness: current +last_reviewed: 2026-11-11 +tags: + - pack/paperclip-harness + - agent-memory/session + - autolearn + - rich-discovery + - repo/link +--- + +# Rich discovery: link. 2026-11-11 21:45:49 + +Sanitized rich discovery snapshot captured automatically from the completed turn. + + +## Source paths observed + +- `nix/store/rgnappqqc5vbq60gza5fflyk84sylwl6-python3-3.14.6/lib/python3.14/json/__init__.py` +- `nix/store/rgnappqqc5vbq60gza5fflyk84sylwl6-python3-3.14.6/lib/python3.14/json/decoder.py` +- `outline.lab.audasmedia.com.au/api/collections.list` +- `home/sam/obsidian/010` +- `gitea.lab.audasmedia.com.au/sam/paperclip-harness.git` +- `paseo/projects/paperclip-harness` +- `hosts/sam-thinkpad/configuration.nix` + +## Final answer snapshot + +## Headroom: what the failure actually is, and what you do + +I tested three configurations on a throwaway container on a spare port, so the running one was untouched: + +| Configuration | Result | +|---|---| +| default image (`HEADROOM_BACKEND` unset → `anthropic`) + your router key | `502 proxy_error` | +| plus `OPENAI_API_KEY` | `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` → `404 No active credentials for provider: openai`; `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash` → `502` | +| plus `HEADROOM_BACKEND=openai` | `502 proxy_error` | + +Two things that answer your questions directly: + +- **`openai/` is not OpenAI's model.** In this stack the prefix names the *protocol* to speak — "use the OpenAI-compatible client" — and the rest is the model name your router uses. So `openai/deepseek-v4-flash` means "call the router with its `deepseek-v4-flash` model". That is why I wrote it that way, and it was a guess about headroom's routing, not a fact. +- **The `404 … provider: openai` came from your router, not headroom.** The router read `openai/` as a provider name and had no key for it. So that path was never going to work with our router's ids. + +`/stats` on the test container reported `api_requests: 0` for all of those attempts — headroom refused or failed before forwarding. That is inside headroom's deployment, and it needs someone with its logs open; nothing in our software can fix it. + +**What does work, re-checked:** `POST /v1/compress` answers 200 and reports tokens before and after. That is the endpoint `headroom-bridge` uses, and `headroom-ai` is now installed on `.13`, `.27` and `.51`. + +**So: use Path A, not both.** `Agents>agents` → `)` to extensions → `space` on `headroom-bridge`. That agent, and no other, gets `compress_for_agent`. Path B is yours to fix in the headroom container if you still want automatic compression; I have recorded the three tests and their exact responses so nobody repeats them. + +## The rest + +**Archify in the Obsidian note** — added, with the map URL, the Mermaid source path, the Outline collection and the repository link. Note is now 3,511 bytes at `010 inbox/Paperclip Harness.md` on `.27`. + +**Outline — pushed.** New collection **Paperclip Harness** with five published documents: + +``` +/doc/00-index-o6hhlKTFXR +/doc/01-system-overview-dGpfQOk1vt +/doc/02-configuration-and-environment-redTWei0y2 +/doc/03-code-map-y6KPFbBbIC +/doc/04-agent-runbook-Sd9ZznhBqo +``` + +**Point 4, specifically.** Two tests, both about whether a person can get from "a folder" to "a working set of panes": + +1. **A brand-new project.** An empty folder, a new Paperclip project, then `bin/office /tmp/fresh-project-2026-11-11 --project fresh-project`. Expected: session created, eight panes built, `Shell>shell` in that folder. **This already passed tonight** — except the session opened at 78 columns and `Board>board` correctly said "this workspace needs 80 × 24", which is the too-small screen doing its job, not a failure. The real test is: switch to that session, press `R` to rebuild at full size, create one task, assign it, watch it run, merge it. +2. **An existing folder.** Adopt this repository: `bin/office ~/paseo/projects/paperclip-harness --project `. Expected: `.harness/` appears, nothing existing is overwritten, the panes read *this* repo's tasks. That proves adoption is safe on real code. + +**Pi versions.** `.51` is 0.87.1; `.13` and `.27` are 0.82.1. You rebuilt `.51` — the Go addition there is in place (`go gopls` in `hosts/sam-thinkpad/configuration.nix`, dry-run evaluates). For Pi: on `.13` and `.27`, Pi is the Nix package `pi-coding-agent`, so aligning means bumping that package in each machine's flake and rebuilding. Do you want me to prepare those two bumps (I can edit both flakes and run the dry-run evaluations), or leave `.13`/`.27` on 0.82.1 since they work? + +Committed as `d2cf643` and pushed to Gitea. + +## Evidence + +- Confidence: 86% +- Reason: Preserve full sanitized discovery detail from a rich investigation turn + +## Related + +- [[packs/paperclip-harness/00-system/pi-agent/memory-manifest|Memory Manifest]] + +## Related learned memories + +- observation: [[packs/paperclip-harness/60-observations/tmp-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|Paperclip Harness acceptance test plan (Point 4) and Pi/Go host versions]] +- runbook: [[packs/paperclip-harness/70-runbooks/tmp-deployment-operations|publish Paperclip Harness docs to Outline and update Obsidian note]] +- decision: [[packs/paperclip-harness/50-decisions/paperclip-harness-ui-six-workspaces-spec-first-four-panel-li|Paperclip Harness: use Path A (headroom-bridge agent extension), not automatic headroom compression]] +- action: [[packs/paperclip-harness/40-actions/2026-11-10-wrote-docs-ui-layout-md-and-three-live-layout-mockups|Paperclip Harness: docs published to Outline, Obsidian note updated, repo pushed]] +- session: [[packs/paperclip-harness/80-sessions/rich-discovery-link-2026-11-11-21-45-49|Rich discovery: link. 2026-11-11 21:45:49]] +- context: [[packs/paperclip-harness/20-context/home|link.]] diff --git a/bin/office b/bin/office index cf57577..62c9fe2 100755 --- a/bin/office +++ b/bin/office @@ -28,7 +28,10 @@ import tuios # noqa: E402 def parse(argv): opts = {"folder": ".", "project": "", "session": "", "dry": "--dry" in argv, - "host": "", "no_switch": "--no-switch" in argv} + "host": "", "no_switch": "--no-switch" in argv, "new": ""} + for i, a in enumerate(argv): + if a == "--new" and i + 1 < len(argv): + opts["new"] = argv[i + 1] args = [a for a in argv if not a.startswith("--")] if args: opts["folder"] = args[0] @@ -42,6 +45,45 @@ def parse(argv): return opts +def create_project(name, folder, dry): + """Create a Paperclip project for a folder, with the worktree policy set. + + Adopting a folder that Paperclip has never heard of needed two steps before: + make the project in the browser, then run this command. One command is enough. + """ + body = { + "name": name, + "description": "Adopted from %s by bin/office." % folder, + "status": "backlog", + "workspace": {"name": name, "sourceType": "git_repo", "cwd": folder, "isPrimary": True}, + "executionWorkspacePolicy": { + "enabled": True, + "defaultMode": "isolated_workspace", + "allowIssueOverride": True, + "workspaceStrategy": {"type": "git_worktree", "baseRef": "main", + "branchTemplate": "{{issue.identifier}}-{{slug}}"}, + }, + } + if dry: + h.say("would create Paperclip project %r for %s" % (name, folder)) + return "(dry run)" + try: + created = h.api("POST", "/api/companies/%s/projects" % h.COMPANY, body) + except h.Refused as exc: + # A project with that name may already exist; adopting it is the right + # thing to do then, not a failure. + try: + for p in h.api("GET", "/api/companies/%s/projects" % h.COMPANY): + if p.get("name") == name: + h.say("project: %s (already in Paperclip)" % name) + return p["id"] + except h.Refused: + pass + raise exc + h.say("project: %s created (%s)" % (name, created.get("id"))) + return created.get("id") + + def ensure_session(session, folder): """Make the session exist. It cannot be shown from here, and that is fine. @@ -126,6 +168,13 @@ def main(): # so one command takes a person from a folder to a working layout. TUIOS has # the verb for exactly this; asking the person to run `tuios new` first was # the step everyone forgot. + if opts["dry"]: + h.say("would create a Paperclip project %r for %s" % (opts["new"] or opts["project"], folder)) + h.say("would write %s" % os.path.join(folder, ".harness", "harness.toml")) + h.say("would create or reuse session %r and build eight panes there" % session) + h.say("dry run: nothing was written") + return 0 + if not opts["no_switch"]: ensure_session(session, folder) @@ -133,6 +182,11 @@ def main(): # Only a note, because the panes are built by the machine that owns them. h.say("host: %s (build the pages there)" % host) + if opts["new"]: + ref = create_project(opts["new"], folder, opts["dry"]) + if not ref: + return 1 + opts["project"] = ref ref = opts["project"] if not ref and pj.exists(folder): ref = pj.load(folder)["paperclip"]["project"] diff --git a/docs/CLEAN-TESTS.md b/docs/CLEAN-TESTS.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..93bd3e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/CLEAN-TESTS.md @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ +# The two clean tests, step by step + +Both tests answer one question: can a person get from a folder to a working set of panes, and +then from a task to merged work, without editing a file. + +Run them in this order. Write down what you see; that is the useful part. + +--- + +## Test 1 — a project that does not exist yet + +### Step 1. Make the folder and its repository + +```sh +mkdir -p ~/paseo/projects/test-alpha +cd ~/paseo/projects/test-alpha +git init -b main +printf '# test alpha\n' > README.md +git add . && git commit -m "initial commit" +``` + +### Step 2. Adopt it with one command + +```sh +cd ~/paseo/projects/paperclip-harness +bin/office ~/paseo/projects/test-alpha --new "test-alpha" +``` + +`--new` creates the Paperclip project, its workspace and the worktree policy. Without `--new`, +`--project ` adopts a project that already exists. + +Expected output: + +``` +project: test-alpha created (…) +folder: /home/sam/paseo/projects/test-alpha +session: test-alpha +machine: nixos-desktop +wrote …/.harness/harness.toml +wrote …/.harness/check.sh +wrote …/.harness/NOTES.md +session: test-alpha (created; switch to it with TUIOS's session switcher) + shell created Shell + board created Board + … +workspaces in use: 8 +``` + +### Step 3. Show the session + +A program cannot move your client: TUIOS refuses that from a pane. Use TUIOS's own session +switcher, or from a terminal: + +```sh +tuios attach test-alpha +``` + +### Step 4. Check the panes + +1. `Repair>repair` → every check passes. +2. `Shell>shell` → the box at the top says the project folder is `…/test-alpha`. +3. `Board>board` → "no tasks in this project". +4. Press `R` once. All eight panes come back, still pointing at `test-alpha`. + +### Step 5. One task, end to end + +1. `New task>new`: title `Add a STATUS.md with one line`, description `Create STATUS.md at the + repository root with the line: alpha is running. Change no other file. Commit it.` + Leave the blocker and the command empty. Assign `yes`. Press `Enter` on the last field. +2. `Board>board`: the task appears and goes `todo` → `in progress` → `done`. +3. `Agents>agents`: `)` to **runs**, `↑` to the newest run, `Enter` → its log. +4. `Work>work`: `change` shows one file, one line. `review` says no review recorded yet. +5. `Work>work` → `v` starts a review; the tab shows it run. +6. `Work>work` → `m` → the dialog names the branch and `main` → `y`. The merge tab shows the + rebase, the check, the review and `merged into main at …`. + +**Pass:** the file exists on `main`, the task is `done`, cost is visible in `Project>costs`, and +nothing was typed into a terminal after step 2. + +--- + +## Test 2 — a folder that already exists + +This uses **this repository**, which is real code with real history. + +### Step 1. Adopt it into its own session + +```sh +cd ~/paseo/projects/paperclip-harness +bin/office . --project harness-repo --session harness-repo +``` + +The project `harness-repo` already exists in Paperclip and points at this folder, so `--project` +adopts it. A separate session is used on purpose: the working session `paperclip-harness` shows +the sandbox project, and this test must not rebuild it. + +### Step 2. Confirm nothing was overwritten + +```sh +git status --short +``` + +Expected: only new files under `.harness/` (the project file, `check.sh`, `NOTES.md`). Nothing +existing is changed. If you see any modified file that you did not touch, stop and say so. + +### Step 3. Show the session and look + +```sh +tuios attach harness-repo +``` + +1. `Project>project` → `projects` tab lists both `spike-2026-11-10` and `harness-repo`, each with + its folder and machine. +2. `Board>board` → empty, because this project has no tasks yet. +3. `New task>new` → create `Add a line to README`, description `Add the line "tested by the + harness" at the end of README.md. Change nothing else. Commit it.`, assign `yes`. +4. Watch it in `Agents>agents`, read the diff in `Work>work`. **Do not merge it** — this is the + repository's own history. Cancel the task with `c` in `Board>board` instead, and confirm in + `git log` that nothing landed. + +**Pass:** the panes read this repository's own tasks, its own worktree is created, the diff shows +only `README.md`, and cancelling removes it from the board without touching `main`. + +--- + +## What to write down + +For each step: what you pressed, what appeared, and anything that did not match. That is worth +more than a verdict, because it says where the interface and Paperclip disagree. diff --git a/docs/DOCMAP.md b/docs/DOCMAP.md index 5664f1e..d40f935 100644 --- a/docs/DOCMAP.md +++ b/docs/DOCMAP.md @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ it is a pointer and should be deleted or replaced. | `docs/PLAN-INTERFACE.md` | this project | the plan: Paperclip object → screen, what exists, what is missing, and in what order | | `docs/SESSIONS.md` | this project | the two kinds of session, where Pi's conversations are, and the plan for the junk TUIOS sessions | | `docs/TEST-PLAN.md` | this project | the test plan: every step, every key, every expected result | +| `docs/CLEAN-TESTS.md` | this project | the two clean tests: a new project from nothing, and adopting an existing folder | | `docs/RUNS-AND-MERGE.md` | this project | what a task, a run and a merge are, with the measured run counts | | `docs/NEXT.md` | this project | what is left to build, in order, and what is still unproven | | `docs/architecture.mmd` | this project | the system diagram in Mermaid: TUIOS panes, the commands, Paperclip, where work happens |