--- type: context id: context.kontra-day.files title: files status: active source_of_truth: false freshness: current last_reviewed: 2026-09-08 tags: - pack/kontra-day - agent-memory/context - autolearn - rich-discovery - repo/files --- # files ## Rich discovery update (2026-09-08 03:36:06) Great — this is the model clicking into place. Short version: **the folder on disk is the website. Everything else is just an editor on top of it.** Here's each question answered. ## The mental model ``` content/ (single git repo, remote = Gitea on your network) │ ┌───────┼───────────┬────────────────┐ │ │ │ │ Neovim Obsidian Decap (web) Go binary (files) (vault) (admin.domain) (renders on request) │ │ │ │ └───────┴───────────┴────────────────┘ all write the SAME .md files ``` - **Neovim**: edit a file → save → Go already sees it. The site *always* reflects the working tree — so nothing ever goes stale. - **Obsidian**: the same folder opens as a vault (it's plain markdown ✓), with Gitea as its git remote, exactly as you use it today. - **Decap**: a browser UI over the *same files* — click collection → articles, edit fields as forms, markdown body editor; on save it commits to git. No duplication, no import/export. - **Go binary**: renders markdown → HTML **per request**. It never "re-outputs" a static build, because there's no build step to run. (Optional in-memory cache later if you want it snappier.) Optional niceties: `published: false` front-matter → hidden from public, visible as preview on `admin.kontra.day`; `publish_at: 2026-…` → scheduled go-live. ## "Editing in Neovim — will Decap/Obsidian sync?" Almost. Everything reads the working tree, so Neovim saves are instantly live either way. The one wrinkle: **Decap shows committed state**, so an uncommitted Neovim edit may not show in the Decap UI until someone commits. Fix = a tiny **file-watcher** (inotify/systemd Path unit) on `content/` that autocommits to git on any change from any editor. Then: *any* editor → autocommit → Gitea push → Decap in sync → Go serves. That one script is the "sync" you're imagining, and it's ~10 lines. ## "How are templates created for the GOTH stack? Can we design them?" Yes — this is exactly **Phase Two** of your AGENT.md, and it's data + code: | Template | What it's made of | |---|---| | `home` (front page composition) | templ component + editable blocks list | | `article` / `opinion` / `photo-essay` / `video` | templ component, chosen per page in front-matter | | `subject-index` (each subject area) | templ component + subject setting | | `archive`, `about`, 404 | templ components | | Look & feel | Tailwind + CSS design-token variables (`--accent` etc.) | Flow: we list the template set → I design 2–3 looks (demos/images) → you approve → they get built as `.templ` components in the binary, themed with tokens so colours/subject accents are admin-editable data, not code. --- The architecture is now concrete enough to write down. Per your AGENT.md Phase One, next step is **PLAN.md + Vikunja/Outline entries** documenting this decision set. Want me to draft PLAN.md and register the phase tasks now — or do you want to change anything in this model first? ## Source paths observed - `www.wisp.blog/compare/winter/keystatic` - `github.com/wintercms/winter` - `plugins/winter/demo` - `www.luckymedia.dev/insights/decap-cms` - `users/roles/auth` - `slug/meta/sitemap/RSS` ## Evidence - Confidence: 84% - Reason: Update component/repository context with detailed discovered structure and configuration ## Related - [[packs/kontra-day/00-system/pi-agent/memory-manifest|Memory Manifest]] ## Related learned memories - session: [[packs/kontra-day/80-sessions/rich-discovery-files-2026-09-08-03-36-06|Rich discovery: files 2026-09-08 03:36:06]] - context: [[packs/kontra-day/20-context/files|files]] - runbook: [[packs/kontra-day/70-runbooks/access-deployment-operations|files deployment operations]] - observation: [[packs/kontra-day/60-observations/access-repository-structure-and-configuration-patterns|files repository structure and configuration patterns]]