sam/internet_use_control
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Phase 9 wiring: name the Hub project internet_control

Browse Source 
The Hub routes by the project name in its human-owned routing.md, which
already names this project `internet_control` (the placeholder row from the
Hub brief). The frozen contract requires the /capabilities name to match that
row, so /capabilities now reports `internet_control` as well.

Found while wiring the live Hub (approved confirmation 60b235f3): the Hub
routed the screen-time question to `internet_control` and returned
`no_client` against a project registered as `internet_use_control`. Aligning
the name, rather than editing the Hub repository or its routing file, makes
the end-to-end round-trip work.

Live proof after the rename and the Hub registration:

  POST http://192.168.20.13:8788/ask
  {"text":"how long have the kids been on screen today?","asker":"sam","source":"console"}
  200 {"status":"ok","answer":"The kids have had 1h 22m of screen time today.",
       "route":{"kind":"project","project":"internet_control"}}

Repository, module and service names are unchanged; only the Hub-facing
project string changed.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
Sam Rolfe
2026-10-13 19:33:54 +11:00
parent 3cf353d933
commit 8c42daf4d9
4 changed files with 16 additions and 10 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
internal/hub/ask_test.go
View File

@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ func TestPermissionsAndUnknowns(t *testing.T) {
func TestDefaultCapabilities(t *testing.T) {
c := DefaultCapabilities()
if c.Project != "internet_use_control" {
if c.Project != "internet_control" {
t.Errorf("project = %q", c.Project)
}
if len(c.Topics) == 0 || len(c.People) == 0 {