ai-resume/content/assets

content/assets — authored exhibits

Everything the site shows that is not Markdown prose. Authored in Phase 7; wired into templates by Phase 2's builder.

content/assets/
├── BUDGET.md              measured weights for every asset, and the budget
├── VERIFY.md              what was checked, with the output pasted in
├── diagrams/              8 SVGs, light and dark in one file each
│   ├── README.md          the visual language and the presentation contract
│   └── manifest.yaml      id, area, level, title, alt text per diagram
├── code/                  6 verbatim excerpts, 212 lines, 5 eras
│   ├── README.md          the rules these follow
│   └── manifest.yaml      era, language, shows, rationale, honest note
└── logos/
    └── clients.yaml       the client wall: 45 entries, 44 distinct names

Three decisions worth knowing

The client wall is type, not logos. Forty-five names in one typeface at one size on an even grid. Nothing is an image, so nothing can break, and no client is visually ranked above another. Ten client marks do exist in Simple Icons; none is enabled, because using a company's mark on a public portfolio is a permission question for Sam, not a design choice for an agent.

Diagrams carry both themes in one file. Not two files that can drift: one <style> block with the light palette and the same selectors repeated under prefers-color-scheme: dark. The eight files therefore share one palette by construction.

Code excerpts are copied, never retyped. Including the defects. An excerpt that has been tidied is a claim, not evidence — and this site's whole argument is that the claims are checkable.

What is wired and what is not

DoD item	State	Evidence
Client wall reads as deliberate, no broken images, no placeholders	assets done, markup not	logos/clients.yaml — 45 entries, zero image references by design. The grid is CSS and belongs to Builder
Eight diagrams, both themes, readable at 1× and on mobile	done	VERIFY.md §1–§3: 0 geometry findings, 8/8 resolve two palettes, rendered widths measured
Six code exhibits with a two-sentence rationale each	done	code/manifest.yaml, VERIFY.md §5
Every image optimised; total weight budgeted and recorded	assets done, page weight not	BUDGET.md. Zero rasters. A full page cannot be weighed until a page exists
Lighthouse ≥ 95 / 95 after assets	not measurable yet	Needs a served page (Phase 3)
Archive never linked or exposed	done	VERIFY.md §6 — no archive path anywhere under content/

The four "not yet" rows are honest gaps, not omissions: three need a page that does not exist until Phase 2 and Phase 3 land, and one needs a live agent console from Phase 5.

Consuming these from templates

// diagrams: "assets/diagrams/01-homelab-topology.svg"
<img src="/assets/diagrams/01-homelab-topology.svg"
     alt="{{ .Alt }}" width="960" height="540" loading="lazy" decoding="async">

The width/height attributes are not optional — they are what stops the page shifting as figures load, which is a Lighthouse CLS and a real annoyance. alt comes from manifest.yaml; if it is set to "" the SVG's own <title>/<desc> are not read out.

Figures go inside a horizontally scrollable wrapper (diagrams/README.md), or a 960 px schematic becomes 5 px type on a phone.

Adding an asset

1. Put the file in the right folder; no external references of any kind.
2. Add an entry to the folder's manifest.yaml with alt and, for code, rationale and honest_note.
3. Re-measure and update BUDGET.md. A budget nobody updates is a wish.