286aa12bb0
Point 7 of the page-wording review. The pages no longer show their data structure as headings, and they no longer explain their own conventions. - Level 1 is one screen: claim, status badge, three figures, the technology row, and one sentence carrying one link. Measured in headless Chrome at 1440x900: 1404-1845 px tall before, exactly 900 px (no scroll) after, on all six area pages. - DocPage: no kicker line, no visible level label, no "Evidence for this page" heading or instruction note, no "Drill-downs" list, no "Status <word> - sentence" footer. The artefact table starts at level 2, under the heading "Artefacts"; the history timeline is level 2 only. - Landing page: "Start here" link text gone, "How to read this site" panel gone, the footer's status-label explainer gone. - Content, presentation only, no claim softened: the leading H1 that duplicated the page title removed from all 41 documents; level 1 bodies reduced to the constraint as ordinary prose plus the way in; "**Status: ...**" prefixes removed from the artefact stubs; "## Drill-downs" and "## Period and confidence" removed from the level 2 pages, with the cross-area links moved into the prose. - The six level 1 claims are now sentences with a subject, and use commas instead of middots. Same facts, no new ones. Not in this commit: the 35 level 2 and 3 claims still use the compact CV style. That is a voice decision for Sam, not a wording tidy-up. make validate: 41 documents, 0 violations. go test ./...: pass. (cherry picked from commit 03009f80fc7815ad7719412e125df9297a6e653f)
1.3 KiB
id, area, level, title, claim, confidence, period, tech, metrics, artefacts, public, last_verified, tags
| id | area | level | title | claim | confidence | period | tech | metrics | artefacts | public | last_verified | tags | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| products-where-woof | products | 3 | Artefact — Where-Woof · deployed and pre-market | A QR and RFID tag system for lost property that is deployed and in use — and has not gone to market. | running | 2020– |
|
|
true | 2026-10-26 |
|
Deployed is true, commercial is not — that is the exact wording the site uses, deliberately.
What the artefact is
A tag system for lost property. A tag carries a QR code and an RFID identity; whoever finds the item resolves the tag and the owner is contacted. The system is running and being deployed now.
What it proves
That a product can be taken into the field before it is monetised, and that the honest label for that state exists. The distinction matters on a CV because the alternative — calling a pre-launch product commercial — is the kind of claim a technical interviewer unpicks in one question.
Limits stated on the page
No customers, no revenue and no launch date are claimed. The metric recorded here is a zero on purpose.
When it is delivered
The tag and resolve-flow photographs land in Phase 7 if Sam chooses to publish them. Product name and description are approved; commercial framing is not.