286aa12bb0
Point 7 of the page-wording review. The pages no longer show their data structure as headings, and they no longer explain their own conventions. - Level 1 is one screen: claim, status badge, three figures, the technology row, and one sentence carrying one link. Measured in headless Chrome at 1440x900: 1404-1845 px tall before, exactly 900 px (no scroll) after, on all six area pages. - DocPage: no kicker line, no visible level label, no "Evidence for this page" heading or instruction note, no "Drill-downs" list, no "Status <word> - sentence" footer. The artefact table starts at level 2, under the heading "Artefacts"; the history timeline is level 2 only. - Landing page: "Start here" link text gone, "How to read this site" panel gone, the footer's status-label explainer gone. - Content, presentation only, no claim softened: the leading H1 that duplicated the page title removed from all 41 documents; level 1 bodies reduced to the constraint as ordinary prose plus the way in; "**Status: ...**" prefixes removed from the artefact stubs; "## Drill-downs" and "## Period and confidence" removed from the level 2 pages, with the cross-area links moved into the prose. - The six level 1 claims are now sentences with a subject, and use commas instead of middots. Same facts, no new ones. Not in this commit: the 35 level 2 and 3 claims still use the compact CV style. That is a voice decision for Sam, not a wording tidy-up. make validate: 41 documents, 0 violations. go test ./...: pass. (cherry picked from commit 03009f80fc7815ad7719412e125df9297a6e653f)
1.5 KiB
id, area, level, title, claim, confidence, period, tech, metrics, artefacts, public, last_verified, tags
| id | area | level | title | claim | confidence | period | tech | metrics | artefacts | public | last_verified | tags | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| edge-lora-sprinkler | edge | 3 | Artefact — LoRa irrigation under solar power | A solar-powered controller that sleeps · wakes on radio · and drives a solenoid — with the first version polling over a message queue instead. | running | 2020– |
|
|
true | 2026-10-26 |
|
The bill of materials and the wake-on-radio change land in Phase 7.
What the artefact is
The build: solar panel, charge controller, LiFePO battery, ESP32, LoRa module, relay and solenoid valve. Version one woke on a schedule and polled through a message queue to learn whether it should run. Version two is better: a LoRa packet can wake the ESP32 from deep sleep and switch the valve directly, so on-time is short and the battery is not spent asking whether there is work.
What it proves
Iteration on a real constraint. The first version worked; the second version was designed around the power cost of asking, which is the kind of decision you only make if you are watching the battery.
Limits stated on the page
Watering is partly scheduled and partly a person. The routine lives in the automation layer and the voice assistant can trigger it, but the garden is not fully automatic and the page does not pretend otherwise.
When it is delivered
Phase 7. Source: evidence notes section 1.