286aa12bb0
Point 7 of the page-wording review. The pages no longer show their data structure as headings, and they no longer explain their own conventions. - Level 1 is one screen: claim, status badge, three figures, the technology row, and one sentence carrying one link. Measured in headless Chrome at 1440x900: 1404-1845 px tall before, exactly 900 px (no scroll) after, on all six area pages. - DocPage: no kicker line, no visible level label, no "Evidence for this page" heading or instruction note, no "Drill-downs" list, no "Status <word> - sentence" footer. The artefact table starts at level 2, under the heading "Artefacts"; the history timeline is level 2 only. - Landing page: "Start here" link text gone, "How to read this site" panel gone, the footer's status-label explainer gone. - Content, presentation only, no claim softened: the leading H1 that duplicated the page title removed from all 41 documents; level 1 bodies reduced to the constraint as ordinary prose plus the way in; "**Status: ...**" prefixes removed from the artefact stubs; "## Drill-downs" and "## Period and confidence" removed from the level 2 pages, with the cross-area links moved into the prose. - The six level 1 claims are now sentences with a subject, and use commas instead of middots. Same facts, no new ones. Not in this commit: the 35 level 2 and 3 claims still use the compact CV style. That is a voice decision for Sam, not a wording tidy-up. make validate: 41 documents, 0 violations. go test ./...: pass. (cherry picked from commit 03009f80fc7815ad7719412e125df9297a6e653f)
1.2 KiB
1.2 KiB
id, area, level, title, claim, confidence, period, tech, metrics, artefacts, public, last_verified, tags
| id | area | level | title | claim | confidence | period | tech | metrics | artefacts | public | last_verified | tags | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| edge-architecture | edge | 3 | Artefact — Edge architecture · power · radio · deep sleep | Each node is designed around its power budget — battery and solar · deep sleep between wakes · and a deliberate choice of wake source per job. | running | 2020– |
|
|
true | 2026-10-26 |
|
One annotated diagram of a representative node and the radio path lands in Phase 7.
What the artefact is
The per-node pattern: 240V step-down or solar with a LiFePO battery and charge controller, an ESP32 in deep sleep, a wake source (timer, radio, or a physical input), a relay or driver for the load, and an MQTT message into the automation layer. Around it, the reason each node uses LoRa, Zigbee or Wi-Fi.
What it proves
Power budgeting and remote wake as design decisions, not hobby wiring — and an architecture that survived being repeated across twenty nodes.
When it is delivered
Phase 7. Source: evidence notes section 1.